Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468026›Full record

ArticlePlant direct2019

The

Will E Hinckley, Keykhosrow Keymanesh, Jaime A Cordova, Judy A Brusslan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant direct, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The leaves fall, yet the tree endures.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Know when and how to die: gaining insights into the molecular regulation of leaf senescence.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Journal of genetics · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Will E HinckleyDepartment of Biological Sciences California State University Long Beach CA USA.
Keykhosrow KeymaneshJoint Genome Institute, DOE Walnut Creek CA USA.
Jaime A CordovaLaboratory of Genetics University of Wisconsin Madison WI USA.
Judy A BrusslanDepartment of Biological Sciences California State University Long Beach CA USA.
California State University, Long Beach · USJoint Genome Institute · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement at CSULBR25GM071638 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH · PI BUONORA, PAUL T, FRASER, DEBORAH ANN · 2004 to 2022
$10.0M
Epigenetic Marks and Leaf Aging in ArabidopsisSC3GM113810 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LONG BEACH · PI BRUSSLAN, JUDY ANN · 2015 to 2018
$331k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM071638NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM113810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrient remobilization during leaf senescence nourishes the growing plant. Understanding the regulation of this process is essential for reducing our dependence on nitrogen fertilizers and increasing agricultural sustainability. Our laboratory is interested in chromatin changes that accompany the transition to leaf senescence. Previously, darker green leaves were reported for

Indexed as

ERF022H3K9acHAC1histone acetylationleaf senescenceMediator complex

Identifiers

PMID31468026
PMCPMC6710649
OpenAlexW2970258543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.