ArticleMethodsX2019
Mixed-trophies biofilm cultivation in capillary reactors.
Article in MethodsX, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biotechnological Applications of Cyanobacteria: Synechocystis and Synechococcus Strains.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2025Review
- Evaluating scaling of capillary photo-biofilm reactors for high cell density cultivation of mixed trophies artificial microbial consortia.Engineering in life sciences · 2023Article
- Process Technologies of Cyanobacteria.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2023Article
- Exploitation of Hetero- and Phototrophic Metabolic Modules for Redox-Intensive Whole-Cell Biocatalysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- The Impact of Glass Material on Growth and Biocatalytic Performance of Mixed-Species Biofilms in Capillary Reactors for Continuous Cyclohexanol Production.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The biocatalytic application of photoautotrophic organisms is a promising alternative for the production of biofuels and value-added compounds as they do not rely on carbohydrates as a source of carbon, electrons, and energy. Although the photoautotrophic organisms hold potential for the development of sustainable processes, suitable reactor concepts that allow high cell density (HCD) cultivation of photoautotrophic microorganisms are limited. Such reactors need a high surface to volume ratio to enhance light availability. Furthermore, the accumulation of high oxygen concentrations as a consequence of oxygenic photosynthesis, and its inhibitory effect on cell growth needs to be prevented. Here, we present a method for HCD cultivation of oxygenic phototrophs based on the co-cultivation of different trophies in a biofilm format to avoid high oxygen partial-pressure and attain HCDs of up to 51.8 g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.