Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31467716›Full record

ReviewJournal of pregnancy2019

Evidence-Based Prevention of Preeclampsia: Commonly Asked Questions in Clinical Practice.

Dagmar Wertaschnigg, Maya Reddy, Ben W J Mol, Fabricio da Silva Costa, Daniel L Rolnik

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pregnancy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dagmar WertaschniggDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1874-5778
Maya ReddyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Ben W J MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8337-550X
Fabricio da Silva CostaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0693-7032
Daniel L RolnikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2263-3592
Monash Health · AUParacelsus Medical University · ATUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review, we discuss the recent literature regarding the prevention of preeclampsia and aim to answer common questions that arise in the routine antenatal care of pregnant women. Prescription of low-dose aspirin for high-risk patients has been shown to reduce the risk of preeclampsia (PE). A daily dose between 100 and 150 mg taken in the evening should be initiated prior to 16 weeks of gestation and can be continued until delivery. Calcium supplementation seems to be advantageous but currently it is only considered for patients with poor dietary intake and high risk for PE. Recent data about heparin are still conflicting, and therefore, heparin can currently not be recommended in the prevention of PE.

Indexed as

AspirinEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleHumansPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPrenatal CareRisk AssessmentAspirin

Identifiers

PMID31467716
PMCPMC6699262
OpenAlexW2966860207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.