ArticleMinimally invasive surgery2019
Assessment of Anastomotic Perfusion in Left-Sided Robotic Assisted Colorectal Resection by Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography.
Article in Minimally invasive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- SAGES 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis for fluorescence image-guided gastrointestinal surgery using indocyanine green.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Indocyanine green and height of anastomosis in colorectal surgery- a network meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on surgeon action and anastomotic leak in colorectal resections. A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Intraoperative bowel perfusion assessment methods and their effects on anastomotic leak rates: meta-analysis.The British journal of surgery · 2023Pooled it
- European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) consensus on Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence-guided surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography decreases the risk of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Impact of change in the surgical plan based on indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on the rates of colorectal anastomotic leak: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Pooled it
- Effect of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography on preventing anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis.Surgery today · 2021Pooled it
- Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography prevents anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Real-time intraoperative perfusion assessment using indocyanine green fluorescence angiography as a predictor of anastomotic integrity in colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Hyperspectral Imaging for Perfusion Assessment and Emerging Decision Support in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Fluorescence-Guided Surgery in Colorectal Cancer: State-of-the-Art and Translational Perspectives.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Review
- Article
- Quantitative evaluation of anastomotic perfusion during colorectal surgery via indocyanine green fluorescence angiography: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Review
- Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIndocyanine green fluorescent angiography (IcGA) has been used with success in guiding intraoperative management to prevent colorectal anastomotic complications. Prior studies in open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery, such as PILLAR II, have demonstrated a low anastomotic leak rate (1.4%). As the minimally invasive approach progresses from laparoscopic to robotic approach, the effect and safety of IcGA in assessing anastomotic perfusion in the latter deserve further investigation.
methodsThe objective of the study was to determine the safety of IcGA in guiding intraoperative management of robotic assisted colorectal resection via perfusion assessment. The design was single-surgeon, retrospective case-control study. 74 patients underwent left-sided robotic assisted colorectal resection and anastomosis with IcGA guidance. 30 historical controls underwent left-sided robotic assisted colorectal resection and anastomosis without IcGA. Clinical, demographic, operative, and outcome variables were tabulated.
resultsIn the control group, 1 patient suffered a postoperative anastomotic stricture requiring no surgery, and 1 patient suffered an anastomotic dehiscence requiring return to the operating room. There were no anastomotic complications in the IcGA group, including 4 patients who underwent a change in the chosen level of anastomosis based on intraoperative IcGA.
conclusionIcGA is safe to use as demonstrated by the very low rate of complications in this case series. It is also safe to rely on to guide re-resection and recreation of an anastomosis intraoperatively by demonstration of blood flow. This may help offset the loss of tactile feedback and assessment of tension in the robotic platform.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.