Observational studyPharmacology research & perspectives2019
Antibiotic dispensing following pediatric visits in the US emergency departments and outpatient settings from 2006 to 2016.
Observational study in Pharmacology research & perspectives, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic prescriptions to preschool children with respiratory tract infections in primary healthcare.JAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2026Article
- The US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel System: a national resource for a learning health system.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Look-Back and Look-Forward Durations and the Apparent Appropriateness of Ambulatory Antibiotic Prescribing.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antibiotic dispensing following pediatric visits in the US emergency departments and outpatient settings from 2006 to 2016.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2019Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study measured rates and trends in antibiotic dispensing for emergency department (ED) and outpatient visits by age groups. This retrospective analysis used data from the National Institutes of Health Collaboratory Distributed Research Network. The analysis included children (aged > 3 months to <12 years) and adolescents (aged 12 to <19 years) with or without an antibiotic dispensed within 3 days following visits for infectious diagnoses occurring from 2006 to 2016, with no antibiotic fills 90 days prior. Diagnoses were classified as: 1) respiratory tract infections (RTIs) for which antibiotics are mostly indicated; 2) RTIs for which antibiotics are mostly not indicated; 3) respiratory conditions for which antibiotics are never indicated; 4) infectious conditions beyond RTIs regardless of antibiotic indication. The largest annual decrease in any dispensed antibiotics (5% per year) was seen in ED visits for not indicated RTIs and never indicated respiratory conditions (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-0.96). In outpatient settings, a 2% per year decrease was seen for not indicated RTIs and never indicated respiratory conditions (IRR 0.98, 95% CI 0.98-0.98). Broad-spectrum antibiotics had a 1% per year increase in outpatient settings for mostly indicated RTIs (IRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.01). Compared with adolescents, broad-spectrum antibiotic dispensing rates and trends were consistently higher for children regardless of diagnosis or care setting. Using national claims data, this real-world analysis found uneven decreases in potentially inappropriate antibiotic dispensing, suggesting the need for antibiotic stewardship interventions to become more common in outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.