Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31467533›Full record

ReviewJournal of oncology2019

Molecular and Clinical Insights into the Invasive Capacity of Glioblastoma Cells.

Carlos Velásquez, Sheila Mansouri, Carla Mora, Farshad Nassiri, Suganth Suppiah, Juan Martino, Gelareh Zadeh, José L Fernández-Luna

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Effects ofMarine drugs · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Practical immunomodulatory landscape of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) therapy.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos VelásquezDepartment of Neurological Surgery and Spine Unit, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla and Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4443-5888
Sheila MansouriMacFeeters-Hamilton Center for Neuro-Oncology Research, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7255-207X
Carla MoraDepartment of Neurological Surgery and Spine Unit, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla and Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Farshad NassiriDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Suganth SuppiahDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Juan MartinoDepartment of Neurological Surgery and Spine Unit, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla and Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.
Gelareh ZadehDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
José L Fernández-LunaGenetics Unit, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla and Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL), Santander, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-3338
University Health Network · CAInstituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla · ESPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invasive capacity of GBM is one of the key tumoral features associated with treatment resistance, recurrence, and poor overall survival. The molecular machinery underlying GBM invasiveness comprises an intricate network of signaling pathways and interactions with the extracellular matrix and host cells. Among them, PI3k/Akt, Wnt, Hedgehog, and NFkB play a crucial role in the cellular processes related to invasion. A better understanding of these pathways could potentially help in developing new therapeutic approaches with better outcomes. Nevertheless, despite significant advances made over the last decade on these molecular and cellular mechanisms, they have not been translated into the clinical practice. Moreover, targeting the infiltrative tumor and its significance regarding outcome is still a major clinical challenge. For instance, the pre- and intraoperative methods used to identify the infiltrative tumor are limited when trying to accurately define the tumor boundaries and the burden of tumor cells in the infiltrated parenchyma. Besides, the impact of treating the infiltrative tumor remains unclear. Here we aim to highlight the molecular and clinical hallmarks of invasion in GBM.

Identifiers

PMID31467533
PMCPMC6699388
OpenAlexW2966347243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.