Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31467500›Full record

ArticleClinical proteomics2019

Potential early clinical stage colorectal cancer diagnosis using a proteomics blood test panel.

Seong Beom Ahn, Samridhi Sharma, Abidali Mohamedali, Sadia Mahboob, William J Redmond, Dana Pascovici, Jemma X Wu, Thiri Zaw, Subash Adhikari, Vineet Vaibhav and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical proteomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Serum/Plasma Proteome in Non-Malignant Liver Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seong Beom Ahn *1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Samridhi Sharma *1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Abidali Mohamedali *2Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Sadia Mahboob1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
William J Redmond1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Dana Pascovici3Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF), Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Jemma X Wu3Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF), Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Thiri Zaw3Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (APAF), Department of Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Subash Adhikari1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Vineet Vaibhav1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.
Edouard C Nice4Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800 Australia.
Mark S Baker1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Level 1, 75 Talavera Road, Sydney, NSW 2109 Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5858-4035
Macquarie University · AUAGRF Ltd · AUMonash University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the most significant challenges in colorectal cancer (CRC) management is the use of compliant early stage population-based diagnostic tests as adjuncts to confirmatory colonoscopy. Despite the near curative nature of early clinical stage surgical resection, mortality remains unacceptably high-as the majority of patients diagnosed by faecal haemoglobin followed by colonoscopy occur at latter stages. Additionally, current population-based screens reliant on fecal occult blood test (FOBT) have low compliance (~ 40%) and tests suffer low sensitivities. Therefore, blood-based diagnostic tests offer survival benefits from their higher compliance (≥ 97%), if they can at least match the sensitivity and specificity of FOBTs. However, discovery of low abundance plasma biomarkers is difficult due to occupancy of a high percentage of proteomic discovery space by many high abundance plasma proteins (e.g., human serum albumin).

methodsA combination of high abundance protein ultradepletion (e.g., MARS-14 and an in-house IgY depletion columns) strategies, extensive peptide fractionation methods (SCX, SAX, High pH and SEC) and SWATH-MS were utilized to uncover protein biomarkers from a cohort of 100 plasma samples (i.e., pools of 20 healthy and 20 stages I-IV CRC plasmas). The differentially expressed proteins were analyzed using ANOVA and pairwise t-tests (p < 0.05; fold-change > 1.5), and further examined with a neural network classification method using in silico augmented 5000 patient datasets.

resultsUltradepletion combined with peptide fractionation allowed for the identification of a total of 513 plasma proteins, 8 of which had not been previously reported in human plasma (based on PeptideAtlas database). SWATH-MS analysis revealed 37 protein biomarker candidates that exhibited differential expression across CRC stages compared to healthy controls. Of those, 7 candidates (CST3, GPX3, CFD, MRC1, COMP, PON1 and ADAMDEC1) were validated using Western blotting and/or ELISA. The neural network classification narrowed down candidate biomarkers to 5 proteins (SAA2, APCS, APOA4, F2 and AMBP) that had maintained accuracy which could discern early (I/II) from late (III/IV) stage CRC.

conclusionMS-based proteomics in combination with ultradepletion strategies have an immense potential of identifying diagnostic protein biosignature.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerEarly stage diagnosisHigh abundant protein depletionPlasma protein biomarkersPredictive modelSWATH-MS

Identifiers

PMID31467500
PMCPMC6712843
OpenAlexW2970644901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.