Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31467461›Full record

ArticleReview of African political economy2018

From Colonization to Globalization: A history of state capture by the tobacco industry in Malawi.

Julia Smith, Kelley Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Review of African political economy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Addressing tobacco industry influence in tobacco-growing countries.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Overview of the Policy and Market Landscape of Tobacco Production and Control in Mozambique.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Explaining Why Farmers Grow Tobacco: Evidence From Malawi, Kenya, and Zambia.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Understanding Alternatives to Tobacco Production in Kenya: A Qualitative Analysis at the Sub-National Level.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. "All Weather Friends": How China Transformed Zimbabwe's Tobacco Sector.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia SmithFaculty of Health Sciences, Blusson Hall, Room 11802, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, jhs6@sfu.ca Julia Smith, PhD, is a Research Fellow in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University.
Kelley LeeFaculty of Health Sciences, Blusson Hall, Room 11802, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Kelley_lee@sfu.ca Kelley Lee is a Professor and Canadian Research Chair in the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3625-1915

Funding

Tobacco Companies, Public Policy and Global HealthR01CA091021 · NCI · U OF L LONDON SCH/HYGIENE &TROPICAL MED · PI LEE, KELLEY · 2001 to 2018
$5.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA091021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malawi, the world's most tobacco dependent country, has long defended the tobacco industry as essential to its economy. The impoverished living conditions of tobacco farmers, however, raise questions about the true benefits accruing to the country. While the government and industry often blame public health advocates for declining leaf prices, and thus lower returns to farmers, this article scrutinises these claims from a historical perspective. It argues that a context of state capture has characterised Malawi's tobacco industry, originating with colonisation and evolving since to become increasingly entrenched. The analysis is divided into four periods: colonial (1890s-1964); national (1964-1981); liberalisation (1981-2004) and accelerated globalisation (2004 to present). Each period demonstrates how industry interests influenced government institutions and policies in ways that increased dependence on a crop that only benefits a minority of Malawians. Today, a transnational elite prospers at the expense of local growers.

Indexed as

agriculturecolonisationdevelopmentglobalisationMalawitobacco

Identifiers

PMID31467461
PMCPMC6715304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.