Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31467424›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2020

The NanoSuit method: a novel histological approach for examining paraffin sections in a nondestructive manner by correlative light and electron microscopy.

Hideya Kawasaki, Toshiya Itoh, Yasuharu Takaku, Hiroshi Suzuki, Isao Kosugi, Shiori Meguro, Toshihide Iwashita, Takahiko Hariyama

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. KMnONpj imaging · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hideya KawasakiInstitute for NanoSuit Research, Preeminent Medical Photonics Education & Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. gloria@hama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8923-7722
Toshiya ItohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yasuharu TakakuInstitute for NanoSuit Research, Preeminent Medical Photonics Education & Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Hiroshi SuzukiDepartment of Chemistry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Isao KosugiDepartment of Regenerative and Infectious Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Shiori MeguroDepartment of Regenerative and Infectious Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Toshihide IwashitaDepartment of Regenerative and Infectious Pathology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Takahiko HariyamaInstitute for NanoSuit Research, Preeminent Medical Photonics Education & Research Center, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan. hariyama@hama-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4388-5972
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine · JPHamamatsu Photonics (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histological examination using the light microscopy is currently the gold standard for life science research and diagnostics. However, magnified observations are limited because of the limitations intrinsic to light microscopy. Thus, a dual approach, known as correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM), has emerged, although several technical challenges remain in terms of observing myriad stored paraffin sections. Previously, we developed the NanoSuit method, which enabled us to keep multicellular organisms alive/wet in the high vacuum of a scanning electron microscope by encasing the sample in a thin, vacuum-proof membrane. The approach uses the native extracellular substance (ECS) or an ECS-mimicking substance to polymerize a membrane by plasma or electron beam irradiation. Since the resulting NanoSuit is flexible and dense enough to prevent a living organism's bodily gas and liquids from evaporating (which we refer to as the "surface shield enhancer" (SSE) effect), it works like a miniature spacesuit with sufficient electron conductivity for an SEM observation. Here, we apply the NanoSuit method to CLEM analysis of paraffin sections. Accordingly, the NanoSuit method permits the study of paraffin sections using CLEM at low and high magnification, with the following features: (i) the integrity of the glass slide is maintained, (ii) three-dimensional microstructures of tissue and pathogens are visualized, (iii) nuclei and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine-stained areas are distinct because of gold chloride usage, (iv) immunohistochemical staining is quantitative, and (v) contained elements can be analyzed. Removal of the SSE solution after observation is a further advantage, as this allows slides to be restained and stored. Thus, the NanoSuit method represents a novel approach that will advance the field of histology.

Indexed as

Histological TechniquesHumansMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningParaffin Embedding

Identifiers

PMID31467424
PMCPMC6917571
OpenAlexW2971258452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.