Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31467368›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Fate of nanoparticles in the central nervous system after intrathecal injection in healthy mice.

K T Householder, S Dharmaraj, D I Sandberg, R J Wechsler-Reya, R W Sirianni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Intrathecal drug delivery in the era of nanomedicine.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Nonviral nanoparticle gene delivery into the CNS for neurological disorders and brain cancer applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

K T HouseholderVivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
S DharmarajVivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
D I SandbergVivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
R J Wechsler-ReyaNCI-Designated Cancer Center, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, 10901N Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
R W SirianniVivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. rachael.w.sirianni@uth.tmc.edu.
Arizona State University · USBarrow Neurological Institute · USSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Intrathecal delivery of radiation sensitizing nanoparticles in pediatric neuro-oncologyR01HD099543 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SIRIANNI, RACHAEL W · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
Targeting Leptomeningeal Metastasis in MedulloblastomaR01NS111292 · NINDS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SIRIANNI, RACHAEL W · 2019 to 2024
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD099543NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS111292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is produced in the cerebral ventricles and circulates within the subarachnoid space (SAS) of the brain and spinal cord, where it exchanges with interstitial fluid of the parenchyma. The access of CSF to the entire central nervous system (CNS) makes it an attractive medium for drug delivery. However, few intrathecal (IT) therapies have reached the clinic due, in part, to limited distribution and rapid clearance. Given the success of nanoparticle (NP) carriers in prolonging circulation and improving delivery of systemically administered agents, we sought to evaluate the distribution of IT injected NPs within the CNS. We administered fluorescent, 100 nm PEGylated-NPs into the cisterna magna of healthy mice and studied their distribution along the brain and spinal cord. Our data demonstrate that NPs are capable of distributing rapidly through the SAS along the entire neuraxis with reproducible, anatomically defined patterns of delivery. NPs were well retained within the leptomeninges for over 3 weeks, showing preference for ventral surfaces and minimal penetration into the CNS parenchyma. Clearance of NPs occurred across the cribriform plate into the nasal mucosa, with a small fraction of NPs localizing with nerve roots exiting the spinal column. Larger 10 µm particles were also capable of moving through the SAS but did not achieve as widespread distribution. These studies demonstrate the ability of NPs to achieve widespread delivery along the neuraxis and highlight IT administration as a potentially significant route of administration for delivery of nanomedicine to the subarachnoid space.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAnimalsBrainInjections, SpinalMicePolyethylene GlycolsPolystyrenesSpinal CordPolyethylene GlycolsPolystyrenes

Identifiers

PMID31467368
PMCPMC6715675
OpenAlexW2970205776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.