Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31467221›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2019

Programmed chromosome fission and fusion enable precise large-scale genome rearrangement and assembly.

Kaihang Wang, Daniel de la Torre, Wesley E Robertson, Jason W Chin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The design and engineering of synthetic genomes.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Synthetic genomes unveil the effects of synonymous recoding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Recent advances in genome-scale engineering inEngineering microbiology · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Conjugation-Based Genome Engineering inACS synthetic biology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Reprogramming the genetic code.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaihang WangMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7657-8755
Daniel de la TorreMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9545-9388
Wesley E RobertsonMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, England, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9812-8288
Jason W ChinMedical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge, England, UK. chin@mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1219-4757
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105181009Medical Research Council MC_UP_A024_1008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The design and creation of synthetic genomes provide a powerful approach to understanding and engineering biology. However, it is often limited by the paucity of methods for precise genome manipulation. Here, we demonstrate the programmed fission of the

Indexed as

DNA CleavageGene FusionGene RearrangementGenome, BacterialChromosome InversionChromosomes, BacterialCRISPR-Associated Protein 9Escherichia coliGenetic EngineeringTranslocation, GeneticCRISPR-Associated Protein 9

Identifiers

PMID31467221
PMCPMC7056355
OpenAlexW2971117654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.