Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31467033›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2020

Consistent control of disease activity with fingolimod versus IFN β-1a in paediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: further insights from PARADIG

Kumaran Deiva, Peter Huppke, Brenda Banwell, Tanuja Chitnis, Jutta Gärtner, Lauren Krupp, Emmanuelle Waubant, Tracy Stites, Gregory Lewis Pearce, Martin Merschhemke

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01892722 (A 2 Year, Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-controlled Core Phase to Evaluate Safety & Efficacy of Daily Fingolimod vs Weekly Interferon β-1a im in Pediatric Patients With Multiple Sclerosis and 5 Year Fingolimod Extension Phase), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01892722 phase3active not recruitingnot on this map

A 2 Year, Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter, Active-controlled Core Phase to Evaluate Safety & Efficacy of Daily Fingolimod vs Weekly Interferon β-1a im in Pediatric Patients With Multiple Sclerosis and 5 Year Fingolimod Extension Phase

TypeinterventionalSponsorNovartis PharmaceuticalsRan2013 to 2030Enrolled240ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsInterferon beta-1a, Fingolimod, Placebo capsule, Placebo i.m. injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Early and active treatment with fingolimod for pediatric onset multiple sclerosis: the experience of an Italian pediatric center over the past 3 years.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Fingolimod as a first- or second-line treatment in a mini-series of young Hellenic patients with adolescent-onset multiple sclerosis: focus on immunological data.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Long-term fingolimod treatment in two pediatric patients with multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Fingolimod as first-line treatment in pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: a case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Kumaran DeivaDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, National Referral Center for Rare Inflammatory Brain and Spinal Diseases, Hopitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France kumaran.deiva@bct.aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-8409-2365
Peter HuppkeDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, German Center for Multiple Sclerosis in Childhood and Adolescence, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Germany.
Brenda BanwellPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Tanuja ChitnisPartners Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jutta GärtnerDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, German Center for Multiple Sclerosis in Childhood and Adolescence, University Medical Center Göttingen, Gottingen, Germany.
Lauren KruppPediatric MS Center, NYU Langone Health, New York City, New York, USA.
Emmanuelle WaubantDepartment of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Tracy StitesNeuroscience Department, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Gregory Lewis PearceStatistics Department, GCE Solutions, Bloomington, Illinois, USA.
Martin MerschhemkeNeuroscience Development Unit, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USGCE Lab School · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (United States) · USNYU Langone Health · USUniversité Paris-Saclay · FRUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn PARADIG

objectivesTo investigate (1) differences between treatment groups across subpopulations (treatment-naïve, younger/prepubertal patients); (2) disability progression.

methodsARRs at 10, 11 and 12 years were estimated based on predefined modelling extrapolations. Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and in 3 month (3M) and 6 month (6M) confirmed disability progression (CDP) were evaluated post hoc.

resultsIn the treatment-naïve subpopulation, fingolimod reduced ARR and n/neT2 lesions by 85.8% and 53.4%, respectively versus INF β-1a (both p<0.001), compared with 81.9% and 52.6% in the overall population. Model-based ARR reductions in younger patients (≤12 years) were 91.9%-94.6%. Twice as many IFN β-1a-treated than fingolimod-treated patients had worse EDSS scores at study end (20.6% vs 10.5%, p=0.043). Risk reductions in 3M-CDP and 6M-CDP were 77.2% (p=0.007) and 80.2% (p=0.040), respectively.

conclusionsFingolimod in paediatric MS was associated with consistent control of disease activity versus IFN β-1a (including treatment-naïve and younger patients) and resulted in less disability progression for up to 2 years. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01892722.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsAge of OnsetChildDisability EvaluationDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodEndpoint DeterminationFemaleFingolimod HydrochlorideHumansInterferon beta-1aKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMultiple SclerosisRisk Reduction BehaviorFingolimod HydrochlorideInterferon beta-1aSphingosine 1 Phosphate Receptor Modulatorsdisability progressionfingolimodgilenyapaediatric multiple sclerosisPARADIGMS

Identifiers

PMID31467033
PMCPMC6952840
OpenAlexW2971252766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.