ArticleFertility and sterility2019
Health outcomes for Massachusetts infants after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer.
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Congenital anomalies observed in children conceived through assisted reproductive technology-a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neonatal Outcomes.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Which is better for mothers and babies: fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Pooled it
- In Vitro Fertilization and VACTERL Birth Defects.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Neonatal and maternal outcomes following transfer of vitrified embryos compared with slow-frozen and fresh embryos: a retrospective study in singletons.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Infertility treatment and the growth of children from birth to 12 years of age: A national cohort study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Frozen versus fresh embryo transfer on perinatal outcomes-do endometrial preparation methods matter?Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Association Between Human Embryo Culture Conditions, Cryopreservation, and the Potential Risk of Birth Defects in Children Conceived Through Assisted Reproduction Technology.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Cryopreservation, cryoprotectants, and potential risk of epigenetic alteration.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Risk Factors for Prematurity and Congenital Malformations in Assisted Reproductive Technology Pregnancies-A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The impact of reference growth standards on small- and large-for-gestational age outcomes among pregnancies conceived by fresh and frozen embryo transfers.F&S reports · 2024Article
- The difference in early trimester fetal growth between singletons after frozen embryo transfer and fresh embryo transfer.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Vitrification of human blastocysts for couples undergoing assisted reproduction: an updated review.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Immune profiling of ART-conceived children in Kazakhstan: a case-control study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Perinatal outcomes in 6640 singleton pregnancies after donor oocyte IVF across three continents over 7 years.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Perinatal outcomes in 13,626 singleton pregnancies after autologous IVF across three continents over 7 years.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Can Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Induce Epigenetic Changes to Gametes and Embryos?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- In vitro fertilization with frozen embryo transfer increased histamine-mediated contractile sensitivity via PKCβ in human umbilical vein.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Article
- The gestational age-specific difference in birthweight between singletons born after fresh and frozen embryo transfer: A cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare neonatal health outcomes after fresh versus frozen ET (FET).
designRetrospective analysis of a population-based database of linked clinically assisted reproductive technology (ART) data with state vital records. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the association between deliveries from fresh versus FET and adverse health outcomes, controlling for maternal characteristics.
settingNot applicable. PATIENT(S): Live-born singleton infants born to Massachusetts women who conceived by fresh or FET after ART using autologous oocytes between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2013. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Preterm birth, low birth weight, neonatal mortality, birth defects, organ system conditions. RESULT(S): Compared with infants conceived from fresh embryos, those born to mothers who underwent FET were less likely to be small for gestational age (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.70) and low birth weight (AOR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88) but more likely to be large for gestational age (AOR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.26-1.70) and to experience greater odds of infectious disease (AOR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.03-2.06), respiratory (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.41), and neurologic (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.68) conditions. There were no statistically significant differences in preterm birth, neonatal mortality, birth defects, cardiovascular, hematologic, and gastrointestinal/feeding conditions, and for infants ≥ 35 weeks, no statistically significant differences in prolonged hospital stay (>3 days for vaginal delivery, >5 days for cesarean). CONCLUSION(S): Compared with infants conceived from fresh ET, those born by FET have higher birth weight but increased odds of infectious disease, hematologic, respiratory, and neurologic abnormalities. These risks should be considered when making decisions on fresh versus FET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.