Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31465981›Full record

ArticlePhytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology2019

Vaccine adjuvant activity of emulsified oils from species of the Pinaceae family.

Christopher B Fox, Neal Van Hoeven, Brian Granger, Susan Lin, Jeffrey A Guderian, Airn Hartwig, Nicole Marlenee, Richard A Bowen, Vagif Soultanov, Darrick Carter

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher B FoxIDRI, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: cfox@idri.org.
Neal Van HoevenIDRI, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, USA.
Brian GrangerIDRI, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, USA.
Susan LinIDRI, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jeffrey A GuderianIDRI, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, USA.
Airn HartwigColorado State University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Nicole MarleneeColorado State University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Richard A BowenColorado State University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Vagif SoultanovPrenolica Limited, 98-106 Moray St., South Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Darrick CarterIDRI, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Infectious Disease Research Institute · USColorado State University · US

Funding

Engineering sustainable squalene analogues for novel vaccine adjuvant emulsionsR01AI135673 · NIAID · ACCESS TO ADVANCED HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI FOX, CHRISTOPHER B · 2018 to 2022
$4.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI135673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNext to aluminum salts, squalene nanoemulsions comprise the most widely employed class of adjuvants in approved vaccines. Despite their importance, the mechanisms of action of squalene nanoemulsions are not completely understood, nor are the structure/function requirements of the oil composition. PURPOSE: In this study, we build on previous work that compared the adjuvant properties of nanoemulsions made with different classes of oil structures to squalene nanoemulsion. Here, we introduce nanoemulsions made with polyprenols derived from species of the Pinaceae family as novel vaccine adjuvant compositions. In contrast with long-chain triglycerides that do not efficiently enhance an immune response, both polyprenols and squalene are comprised of multimeric isoprene units, which may represent an important structural property of oils in nanoemulsions with adjuvant properties. STUDY

designOils derived from species of the Pinaceae family were formulated in nanoemulsions, with or without a synthetic Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) ligand, and characterized regarding physicochemical and biological activity properties in comparison to squalene nanoemulsions.

methodsOils were extracted from species of the Pinaceae family and used to prepare oil-in-water nanoemulsions by microfluidization. Emulsion droplet diameter stability was characterized by dynamic light scattering. Nanoemulsions were evaluated for in vitro biological activity using human whole blood, and in vivo biological activity in mouse, pig, and ferret models when combined with pandemic influenza vaccine antigens.

resultsNanoemulsions comprised of Pinaceae-derived polyprenol oils demonstrated long-term physical stability, stimulated cytokine production from human cells in vitro, and promoted antigen-specific immune responses in various animal models, particularly when formulated with the TLR4 ligand glucopyranosyl lipid adjuvant (GLA).

conclusionPinaceae-derived nanoemulsions are compatible with inclusion of a synthetic TLR4 ligand and promote antigen-specific immune responses to pandemic influenza antigens in mouse, pig, and ferret models.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsEmulsionsFemaleFerretsHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPinaceaePlant OilsPolyprenolsSpecific Pathogen-Free OrganismsSqualeneAdjuvants, ImmunologicEmulsionsInfluenza VaccinesPlant OilsPolyprenolsSqualeneTLR4 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 4ConifersInfluenzaNanoemulsionPolyprenolsSqualeneVaccine adjuvant

Identifiers

PMID31465981
PMCPMC6790179
OpenAlexW2937752144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.