Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31465522›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Longitudinal follow up of serological response in children treated for Chagas disease.

Guillermo Moscatelli, Samanta Moroni, Facundo García Bournissen, Nicolás González, Griselda Ballering, Alejandro Schijman, Ricardo Corral, Margarita Bisio, Héctor Freilij, Jaime Altcheh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Clinical use of molecular methods forFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guillermo MoscatelliParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-6986-4646
Samanta MoroniParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Facundo García BournissenParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nicolás GonzálezParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Griselda BalleringParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Alejandro SchijmanMolecular Biology Laboratory of Chagas disease, INGEBI-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ricardo CorralParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Margarita BisioParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Héctor FreilijParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Jaime AltchehParasitology service Ricardo Gutiérrez Children´s Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARHospital General de Niños Ricardo Gutierrez · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of therapeutic response in chronic Chagas disease is a major challenge, due to prolonged persistence of Trypanosoma cruzi-specific antibodies, lack of sensitivity of parasitological tests, and need for long-term follow-up to observe negative seroconversion of conventional serological tests (CS). The objective of this study was to evaluate F2/3-ELISA serology, a promising early biomarker of therapeutic response, and T.cruzi Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for T. cruzi Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), for neonatal diagnosis and evaluation of parasitemia after treatment.

methodsProspective cohort study, with three-year clinical, serological and parasitological follow-up of pediatric Chagas disease patients treated with benznidazole. Serology was evaluated by Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay (ELISA), Indirect hemagglutination (IHA) and F2/3-ELISA; Parasitemia by microhematocrit (MH) and PCR.

resultsA cohort of 107 pediatric patients treated with benznidazole was enrolled in the study. ELISA and IHA were initially reactive in 100% of patients, F2/3-ELISA serology was reactive in 80% (86/107) and 91% (97/107) had detectable parasitemia. Seventy-six (71%) patients completed at least 36 months of serological follow up after treatment. Although a similar decreasing linear trend was observed for all serological tests, F2/3-ELISA presented earlier, age dependent, negative seroconversion compared to CS. All patients reaching undetectable CS titers had previously seroreverted by F2/3-ELISA. All patients with persistently decreasing antibody titers had negative PCRs throughout the follow up period. No new cardiological lesions were observed during the 3 years follow-up period.

conclusionsThe data reported here, using CS, F2/3 ELISA and PCR provide support for the efficacy of benznidazole in congenital Chagas diseases. These results provide support for scaling up of screening, diagnosis and access to benznidazole treatment.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov 0028/04 in the Research Council, Secretary of Health Buenos Aires city Goberment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntibodies, ProtozoanAntibody FormationAntiprotozoal AgentsChagas DiseaseChildChild, PreschoolDrug MonitoringFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMaleNitroimidazolesProspective StudiesAntibodies, ProtozoanAntiprotozoal AgentsbenzonidazoleNitroimidazoles

Identifiers

PMID31465522
PMCPMC6715178
OpenAlexW2970664791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.