ArticlePloS one2019
Single-step genomic prediction of fruit-quality traits using phenotypic records of non-genotyped relatives in citrus.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerating genetic gain through integrated genomic selection in crop plants.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Review
- Genetic Dissection and Breeding Potential of Carotenoid Content in Foxtail Millet (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Genomic prediction in Persian walnut: Optimization levers according to genetic architecture of complex traits.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Optimizing the single-step model for predicting fumonisins resistance in maize hybrids accounting for the genotype-by-environment interaction.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Genetic analysis of mixed models of fruit sugar-acid fractions in a cross between jujube (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genetic modulation of Valencia sweet orange field performance by 50 rootstocks under huanglongbing-endemic conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Advancing tree genomics to future proof next generation orchard production.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- A Note on the Conditioning of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022Review
- Dissecting Breeders' SenseFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Genomic Selection: A Tool for Accelerating the Efficiency of Molecular Breeding for Development of Climate-Resilient Crops.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The potential of genomic selection (GS) is currently being evaluated for fruit breeding. GS models are usually constructed based on information from both the genotype and phenotype of population. However, information from phenotyped but non-genotyped relatives can also be used to construct GS models, and this additional information can improve their accuracy. In the present study, we evaluated the utility of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) in citrus breeding, which is a genomic prediction method that combines the kinship information from genotyped and non-genotyped relatives into a single relationship matrix for a mixed model to apply GS. Fruit weight, sugar content, and acid content of 1,935 citrus individuals, of which 483 had genotype data of 2,354 genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms, were evaluated from 2009-2012. The prediction accuracy of ssGBLUP for genotyped individuals was similar to or higher than that of usual genomic best linear unbiased prediction method using only genotyped individuals, especially for sugar content. Therefore, ssGBLUP could yield higher accuracy in genotyped individuals by adding information from non-genotyped relatives. The prediction accuracy of ssGBLUP for non-genotyped individuals was also slightly higher than that of conventional best linear unbiased prediction method using pedigree information. This indicates that ssGBLUP can enhance prediction accuracy of breeding values for non-genotyped individuals using genomic information of genotyped relatives. These results demonstrate the potential of ssGBLUP for fruit breeding, including citrus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.