Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31465502›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Single-step genomic prediction of fruit-quality traits using phenotypic records of non-genotyped relatives in citrus.

Atsushi Imai, Takeshi Kuniga, Terutaka Yoshioka, Keisuke Nonaka, Nobuhito Mitani, Hiroshi Fukamachi, Naofumi Hiehata, Masashi Yamamoto, Takeshi Hayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Note on the Conditioning of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  9. Genomic selection in tropical perennial crops and plantation trees: a review.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2022
    Review
  10. Dissecting Breeders' SenseFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Atsushi ImaiInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0826-3935
Takeshi KunigaWestern Region Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Senyucho, Zentsuji, Kagawa, Japan.
Terutaka YoshiokaWestern Region Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Senyucho, Zentsuji, Kagawa, Japan.
Keisuke NonakaInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Okitsunakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Nobuhito MitaniInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Fujimoto, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hiroshi FukamachiInstitute of Fruit Tree and Tea Science, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Okitsunakacho, Shimizu, Shizuoka, Japan.
Naofumi HiehataNagasaki Agricultural and Forestry Technical Development Center, Nagasaki Prefectural Government, Kaizumachi, Isahaya, Nagasaki, Japan.
Masashi YamamotoFaculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University, Korimoto, Kagoshima, Kagoshima, Japan.
Takeshi HayashiGraduate School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potential of genomic selection (GS) is currently being evaluated for fruit breeding. GS models are usually constructed based on information from both the genotype and phenotype of population. However, information from phenotyped but non-genotyped relatives can also be used to construct GS models, and this additional information can improve their accuracy. In the present study, we evaluated the utility of single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) in citrus breeding, which is a genomic prediction method that combines the kinship information from genotyped and non-genotyped relatives into a single relationship matrix for a mixed model to apply GS. Fruit weight, sugar content, and acid content of 1,935 citrus individuals, of which 483 had genotype data of 2,354 genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms, were evaluated from 2009-2012. The prediction accuracy of ssGBLUP for genotyped individuals was similar to or higher than that of usual genomic best linear unbiased prediction method using only genotyped individuals, especially for sugar content. Therefore, ssGBLUP could yield higher accuracy in genotyped individuals by adding information from non-genotyped relatives. The prediction accuracy of ssGBLUP for non-genotyped individuals was also slightly higher than that of conventional best linear unbiased prediction method using pedigree information. This indicates that ssGBLUP can enhance prediction accuracy of breeding values for non-genotyped individuals using genomic information of genotyped relatives. These results demonstrate the potential of ssGBLUP for fruit breeding, including citrus.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantGenomicsGenotypePhenotypeAlgorithmsCitrusModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID31465502
PMCPMC6715226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.