ArticlePloS one2019
The optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during intraoperative neuromonitoring in middle ear surgery.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane anesthesia on intraoperative facial nerve monitoring: a randomized controlled trial.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the optimal and safe intensity for facial nerve stimulation during middle ear surgery.
methodsThirty-seven patients who had their facial nerve exposed prior to surgery were prospectively enrolled in this study, and electromyography (EMG) recordings were obtained from the orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris muscles. Four pigs were also enrolled in an animal study, and continuous stimulation was performed on the facial nerves of the pigs for 10 minutes. The EMG responses were measured and the pathologic outcomes of the facial nerve after stimulation were determined.
resultsIn the human study, the mean intensity of the minimal electrical stimulation threshold was 0.21 mA (range: 0.1-0.3 mA). A linear correlation was observed between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for intensities below 0.4 mA. Response amplitudes reached a plateau between 0.4 mA and 1.0 mA. The minimal stimulus intensity that could generate a maximal response was 0.4 mA in the orbicularis oculi (244 μV) and orbicularis oris (545 μV). In the animal study, there were no observed changes in EMG or nerve damage incidence after the continuous stimulation of 3.0 mA.
conclusions0.4 mA is considered to be the optimal intensity of facial nerve stimulation during middle ear surgery, and it was estimated through the animal study that a stimulation of 3.0 mA is safe from facial nerve damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.