Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31465445›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparison of efficacy and safety of single versus repeated intra-articular injection of allogeneic neonatal mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of osteoarthritis of the metacarpophalangeal/metatarsophalangeal joint in horses: A clinical pilot study.

Carmelo Magri, Michael Schramme, Marine Febre, Eddy Cauvin, Fabrice Labadie, Nathalie Saulnier, Isé François, Antoine Lechartier, David Aebischer, Anne-Sophie Moncelet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmelo MagriClinéquine, VetAgro Sup, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1854-149X
Michael SchrammeClinéquine, VetAgro Sup, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Marine FebreVetbiobank SAS, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Eddy CauvinAzurvet, Cagnes-sur-Mer, France.
Fabrice LabadieVetbiobank SAS, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Nathalie SaulnierVetbiobank SAS, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Isé FrançoisClinéquine, VetAgro Sup, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
Antoine LechartierClinique équine vétérinaire de Meheudin, Ecouché, France.
David AebischerClinique équine Areda, Bex, Switzerland.
Anne-Sophie MonceletClinique équine de Grosbois, Marolles-en-Brie, France.
Stéphane MaddensVetbiobank SAS, Campus Vétérinaire de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, France.
VetAgro Sup · FRSwiss Institute of Equine Medicine · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effects of single and repeated intra-articular administration of allogeneic, umbilical cord-derived, neonatal mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in horses with lameness due to osteoarthritis (OA) of a metacarpophalangeal joint (MPJ). Twenty-eight horses were included. Horses were divided into two groups. Horses in group MSC1 received an MSC injection at M0 and a placebo injection at M1 (1 month after M0). Horses in group MSC2 received MSC injections at M0 and at M1. Joint injections were performed with a blinded syringe. Clinical assessment was performed by the treating veterinarian at M1, M2 and M6 (2 and 6 months after M0), including lameness evaluation, palpation and flexion of the joint. Radiographic examination of the treated joints was performed at inclusion and repeated at M6. Radiographs were anonymized and assessed by 2 ECVDI LA associate members. Short term safety assessment was performed by owner survey. A 2-month rehabilitation program was recommended to veterinarians. There was a significant improvement of the total clinical score for horses in both groups. There was no significant difference in the total clinical score between groups MSC1 and MSC2 at any time point in the study. There was no significant difference in the total radiographic OA score, osteophyte score, joint space width score and subchondral bone score between inclusion and M6. Owner-detected adverse effects to MSC injection were recorded in 18% of the horses. Lameness caused by OA improved significantly over the 6-month duration of the study after treatment with allogeneic neonatal umbilical cord-derived MSCs combined with 8 weeks rest and rehabilitation. There is no apparent clinical benefit of repeated intra-articular administration of MSCs at a 1-month interval in horses with MPJ OA when compared to the effect of a single injection.

Indexed as

HorsesMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMetacarpophalangeal JointMetatarsophalangeal JointAllograftsAnimalsFemaleHorse DiseasesMaleOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID31465445
PMCPMC6715221
OpenAlexW2970435916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.