ArticlePloS one2019
Rapid and long-lasting improvements in neural discrimination of acoustic signals with passive familiarization.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Novel sound exposure drives dynamic changes in auditory lateralization that are associated with perceptual learning in zebra finches.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Sensory cortex plasticity supports auditory social learning.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Dynamic encoding of phonetic categories in zebra finch auditory forebrain.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Implicit auditory memory in older listeners: From encoding to 6-month retention.Current research in neurobiology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory representations in the adult brain must undergo dynamic changes to adapt to the complexity of the external world. This study investigated how passive exposure to novel sounds modifies neural representations to facilitate recognition and discrimination, using the zebra finch model organism. The neural responses in an auditory structure in the zebra finch brain, Caudal Medial Nidopallium (NCM), undergo a long-term form of adaptation with repeated stimulus presentation, providing an excellent substrate to probe the neural underpinnings of adaptive sensory representations. In Experiment 1, electrophysiological activity in NCM was recorded under passive listening conditions as novel natural vocalizations were familiarized through playback. Neural decoding of stimuli using the temporal profiles of both single-unit and multi-unit responses improved dramatically during the first few stimulus presentations. During subsequent encounters, these signals were recognized after hearing fewer initial acoustic features. Remarkably, the accuracy of neural decoding was higher when different stimuli were heard in separate blocks compared to when they were presented randomly in a shuffled sequence. NCM neurons with narrow spike waveforms generally yielded higher neural decoding accuracy than wide spike neurons, but the rate at which these accuracies improved with passive exposure was comparable between the two neuron types. Experiment 2 supported and extended these findings by showing that the rapid gains in neural decoding of novel vocalizations with passive familiarization were long-lasting, maintained for 20 hours after the initial encounter, in multi-unit responses. Taken together, these findings provide valuable insights into the mechanisms by which the nervous system dynamically modulates sensory representations to improve discrimination of novel complex signals over short and long timescales. Similar mechanisms may also be engaged during processing of human speech signals, and thus may have potential translational relevance for elucidating the neural basis of speech comprehension difficulties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.