Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464944›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Protocol for systematic reviews of school-based food and nutrition education intervention for adolescent health promotion: Evidence mapping and syntheses.

Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de Medeiros, Kesley Pablo Morais de Azevedo, Daniel Ángel Garcia, Victor Hugo de Oliveira Segundo, Ádala Nayana de Sousa Mata, Karla Silveria Dias Pinheiro de Siqueira, Anny Karoliny Pinheiro Fernandes, Raquel Praxedes Dos Santos, Débora Danielly Barros de Brito Trindade, Clélia de Oliveira Lyra and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gidyenne Christine Bandeira Silva de MedeirosDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.
Kesley Pablo Morais de AzevedoGraduate Program in Public Health, UFRN, Natal, Brazil.
Daniel Ángel GarciaDepartment of Physiotherapy, San Antonio de Murcia Catholic University, Spain.
Victor Hugo de Oliveira SegundoGraduate Program in Public Health, UFRN, Natal, Brazil.
Ádala Nayana de Sousa MataMulticampi School of Medical Sciences of RN.
Karla Silveria Dias Pinheiro de SiqueiraMonte das Gameleiras Municipal Government.
Anny Karoliny Pinheiro FernandesDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.
Raquel Praxedes Dos SantosDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.
Débora Danielly Barros de Brito TrindadeDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.
Clélia de Oliveira LyraDepartment of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.
Grasiela PiuvezamGraduate Program in Public Health, UFRN, Natal, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNutrition is an important modifiable factor in combating overweight and obesity among adolescents. School has been indicated as an effective environment for influencing eating behavior; however, recent reviews assessing school-based interventions specifically for adolescents are scarce. Therefore, we propose the present systematic review with the aim to comprehensively review the quantitative and qualitative literature on the effects of school-based food and nutrition education interventions on adolescent health promotion through healthy eating habits.

methodsWe will search MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Cochrane, LILACS, and ADOLEC. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCT), non-RCT, and controlled before-after studies. Risk of bias will be assessed using the EPOC Risk of Bias Tool for RCT, Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-RCT or controlled before-after, as well as the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist for qualitative studies. We will analyze the overall strength of the evidence for each outcome using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. Two independent researchers will conduct all evaluations and any disagreements will be consulted with a third reviewer. Data analysis and synthesis will be analyzed by the RevMan 5.3 software. We will conduct the study in accordance with the guideline of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses Protocols.

resultThis review will evaluate the effects of school-based food and nutrition education interventions on adolescent health promotion through healthy eating habits. The primary outcome will be changes in adolescent food consumption. Secondary outcomes will be biological parameters (e.g., body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), body composition, etc); biochemical parameters (e.g., glycemia, triglycerides, total cholesterol, etc); qualitative evidences that support or explain the effect of school-based food and nutrition education interventions on adolescent food consumption.

conclusionThe findings of this systematic review will summarize the latest evidence of the effects of school-based food and nutrition education interventions on adolescent health promotion. The findings will be an available reference for school-based interventions and other further research. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019116520.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdolescent HealthBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexBody Weights and MeasuresDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorHealth EducationHealth PromotionHumansLipidsResearch DesignSchool Health ServicesSystematic Reviews as TopicBlood GlucoseLipids

Identifiers

PMID31464944
PMCPMC6736443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.