Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464935›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Multicenter study of lumbar discectomy with Barricaid annular closure device for prevention of lumbar disc reherniation in US patients: A historically controlled post-market study protocol.

K Brandon Strenge, Christian P DiPaola, Larry E Miller, Clint P Hill, Robert G Whitmore

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03986580 (Prospective Evaluation Of Lumbar Discectomy With Additional Implantation Of An Annular Closure Device In Patients With Large Postsurgical Annular Defects For Prevention Of Lumbar Disc Reherniation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03986580 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Evaluation Of Lumbar Discectomy With Additional Implantation Of An Annular Closure Device In Patients With Large Postsurgical Annular Defects For Prevention Of Lumbar Disc Reherniation

TypeinterventionalSponsorIntrinsic TherapeuticsRan2020 to 2024Enrolled55ConditionsLumbar Disc HerniationArmsAnnular closure device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Annular Closure Device Reduces Symptomatic Reherniation Rates: Results of a Meta-analysis.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

K Brandon StrengeThe Orthopaedic Institute, Paducah, Kentucky.
Christian P DiPaolaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester.
Larry E MillerMiller Scientific Consulting, Inc., Asheville, North Carolina.
Clint P HillThe Orthopaedic Institute, Paducah, Kentucky.
Robert G WhitmoreDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
The Orthopaedic Institute · USLahey Medical Center · USUMass Memorial Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with large defects in the annulus fibrosus following lumbar discectomy have high rates of symptomatic reherniation. The Barricaid annular closure device provides durable occlusion of the annular defect and has been shown to significantly lower the risk of symptomatic reherniation in a large European randomized trial. However, the performance of the Barricaid device in a United States (US) population has not been previously reported. DESIGN AND

methodsThis is a historically controlled post-market multicenter study to determine the safety and efficacy of the Barricaid device when used in addition to primary lumbar discectomy in a US population. A total of 75 patients with large annular defects will receive the Barricaid device following lumbar discectomy at up to 25 sites in the US and will return for clinical and imaging follow-up at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year. Trial oversight will be provided by a data safety monitoring board and imaging studies will be read by an independent imaging core laboratory. Patients treated with the Barricaid device in a previous European randomized trial with comparable eligibility criteria, surgical procedures, and outcome measures will serve as historical controls. Main outcomes will include back pain severity, leg pain severity, Oswestry Disability Index, health utility on the EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire, complications, symptomatic reherniation, and reoperation. Propensity score adjustment using inverse probability of treatment weighting will be used to adjust for differences in baseline patient characteristics between the US trial participants and European historical controls. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by a central institutional review board. The study results of this trial will be widely disseminated at conference proceedings and published in peer-reviewed journals. The outcomes of this study will have important clinical and economic implications for all stakeholders involved in treating patients with lumbar discectomy in the US. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov): NCT03986580. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Indexed as

DiskectomyIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeAdultAgedClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicDisability EvaluationFemaleHealth StatusHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicPainPostoperative ComplicationsProduct Surveillance, Postmarketing

Identifiers

PMID31464935
PMCPMC6736093
OpenAlexW2970690931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.