Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464927›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2019

Apatinib as an optional treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Aiyi Li, Kong Wang, Aiguo Xu, Gang Wang, Yongchang Miao, Zhichao Sun, Jingyu Zhang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aiyi LiDepartment of Sterile and Supple Center.
Kong WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory.
Aiguo XuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology.
Gang WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
Yongchang MiaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
Zhichao SunDepartment of Pathology, the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, China.
Jingyu ZhangDepartment of Pathology, the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiangiogenic therapy has shown clinical benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in patients who failed standard treatment and to explore potential factors related to its efficacy.A total of 47 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients who received apatinib therapy after failure of standard therapy from December 2014 and February 2018 were included. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events were recorded and evaluated.The median PFS was 3.717 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.198-4.235), and the median OS was 7.335 months (95% CI, 6.738-7.932). The disease control rate was 72.34%, and the ORR was 8.51%. The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse reactions were hypertension, proteinuria, hand-foot syndrome, and diarrhea. Multivariate analysis indicated previous antiangiogenic therapy and baseline elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as independent prognostic factors.Apatinib might be a reasonable treatment option with a controlled safety profile for patients with mCRC who have failed standard therapy. Patients who previously received antiangiogenic therapy and who have baseline elevated NLR are more likely to benefit from apatinib.

Indexed as

Administration, OralColonic NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridinesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeapatinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyridines

Identifiers

PMID31464927
PMCPMC6736175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.