ArticleMedicine2019
A case report of spontaneous coronary artery dissection complicated by stent fracture.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleSpontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare, complex disease, and nowadays poorly understood. The overall incidence of SCAD ranges from 0.28% to 1.1% in angiographic studies. Therefore, the true incidence of SCAD is most likely underestimated due to asymptomatic or sudden cardiac death before diagnosis. Stent fracture (SF) is a multifactorial issue. Longer vessel remodeled by 2 stents can be more prone to have SF due to higher radial force. PATIENT CONCERNS: In this paper we report a 48-year-old man with chest pain for 2 years. DIAGNOSES: Elective coronary angiography revealed a linear dissection in obtuse marginal branch (OM).
interventionsHe underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the guidance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). OUTCOMES: Then SF was revealed 9 months later. LESSONS: This is the first case report of SF after coronary intervention therapy in SCAD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.