Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464843›Full record

ArticleMedical care2019

Comparison of Pharmacy Database Methods for Determining Prevalent Chronic Medication Use.

Timothy S Anderson, Bocheng Jing, Charlie M Wray, Sarah Ngo, Edison Xu, Kathy Fung, Michael A Steinman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Hospitalizations on Problematic Medication Use Among Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Medication misuse and overuse in community-dwelling persons with dementia.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy S AndersonDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Bocheng JingDivision of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco.
Charlie M WrayDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Sarah NgoDivision of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco.
Edison XuDivision of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco.
Kathy FungDivision of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco.
Michael A SteinmanDivision of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco.

Funding

VARC CoreP30AG044281 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Alexander Keliimoeanu Smith · 2013 to 2026
$19.9M
Unnecessary and Harmful Medication Use in Older Adults with DementiaP01AG066605 · NIA · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MELISSA Diane ALDRIDGE · 2020 to 2026
$17.7M
U.S. Deprescribing Research NetworkR24AG064025 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI BOYD, CYNTHIA MELINDA, STEINMAN, MICHAEL A. · 2019 to 2023
$9.9M
Prescribing cascades in older adults with and without dementiaK24AG049057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI STEINMAN, MICHAEL A. · 2015 to 2025
$1.8M
Impact of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalized Older AdultsR03AG064373 · NIA · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, TIMOTHY S · 2019 to 2020
$274k
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG049057NIA NIH HHS L30 AG060493NIA NIH HHS P01 AG066605NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044281NIA NIH HHS R03 AG064373NIA NIH HHS R24 AG064025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacy dispensing data are frequently used to identify prevalent medication use as a predictor or covariate in observational research studies. Although several methods have been proposed for using pharmacy dispensing data to identify prevalent medication use, little is known about their comparative performance.

objectivesThe authors sought to compare the performance of different methods for identifying prevalent outpatient medication use. RESEARCH

designOutpatient pharmacy fill data were compared with medication reconciliation notes denoting prevalent outpatient medication use at the time of hospital admission for a random sample of 207 patients drawn from a national cohort of patients admitted to Veterans Affairs hospitals. Using reconciliation notes as the criterion standard, we determined the test characteristics of 12 pharmacy database algorithms for determining prevalent use of 11 classes of cardiovascular and diabetes medications.

resultsThe best-performing algorithms included a 180-day fixed look-back period approach (sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 97%; and positive predictive value, 89%) and a medication-on-hand approach with a grace period of 60 days (sensitivity, 91%; specificity, 97%; and positive predictive value, 91%). Algorithms that have been commonly used in previous studies, such as defining prevalent medications to include any medications filled in the prior year or only medications filled in the prior 30 days, performed less well. Algorithm performance was less accurate among patients recently receiving hospital or nursing facility care.

conclusionPharmacy database algorithms that balance recentness of medication fills with grace periods performed better than more simplistic approaches and should be considered for future studies which examine prevalent chronic medication use.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansMaleMedication ReconciliationMiddle AgedOutpatientsPharmaciesPrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID31464843
PMCPMC6742560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.