Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464686›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

The cerebellum is involved in processing of predictions and prediction errors in a fear conditioning paradigm.

Thomas Michael Ernst, Anna Evelina Brol, Marcel Gratz, Christoph Ritter, Ulrike Bingel, Marc Schlamann, Stefan Maderwald, Harald H Quick, Christian Josef Merz, Dagmar Timmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thomas Michael ErnstDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2170-9241
Anna Evelina BrolDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Marcel GratzErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christoph RitterDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Ulrike BingelDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Marc SchlamannInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Stefan MaderwaldErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Harald H QuickErwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Christian Josef Merz *Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Dagmar Timmann *Department of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 316803389 (SFB1280, project A05)Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 316803389 (SFB1280, project A09)Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 316803389 (SFB1280, project A11)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction errors are thought to drive associative fear learning. Surprisingly little is known about the possible contribution of the cerebellum. To address this question, healthy participants underwent a differential fear conditioning paradigm during 7T magnetic resonance imaging. An event-related design allowed us to separate cerebellar fMRI signals related to the visual conditioned stimulus (CS) from signals related to the subsequent unconditioned stimulus (US; an aversive electric shock). We found significant activation of cerebellar lobules Crus I and VI bilaterally related to the CS+ compared to the CS-. Most importantly, significant activation of lobules Crus I and VI was also present during the unexpected omission of the US in unreinforced CS+ acquisition trials. This activation disappeared during extinction when US omission became expected. These findings provide evidence that the cerebellum has to be added to the neural network processing predictions and prediction errors in the emotional domain.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalFearAdultBrain MappingCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adultaversive conditioningcerebellar hemisphereemotionsextinctionfearhumanneurosciencevermis

Identifiers

PMID31464686
PMCPMC6715348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.