Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464654›Full record

ReviewCancer communications (London, England)2019

Cancer cell reprogramming: a promising therapy converting malignancy to benignity.

Lanqi Gong, Qian Yan, Yu Zhang, Xiaona Fang, Beilei Liu, Xinyuan Guan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer communications (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Can the reprogrammed cancer cells serve as an alternative source of (induced) cancer stem cells?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lanqi GongDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P.R. China.
Qian YanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P.R. China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P.R. China.
Xiaona FangDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P.R. China.
Beilei LiuDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P.R. China.
Xinyuan GuanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 999077, P.R. China. xyguan@hku.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, remarkable progress has been made in reprogramming terminally differentiated somatic cells and cancer cells into induced pluripotent cells and cancer cells with benign phenotypes. Recent studies have explored various approaches to induce reprogramming from one cell type to another, including lineage-specific transcription factors-, combinatorial small molecules-, microRNAs- and embryonic microenvironment-derived exosome-mediated reprogramming. These reprogramming approaches have been proven to be technically feasible and versatile to enable re-activation of sequestered epigenetic regions, thus driving fate decisions of differentiated cells. One of the significant utilities of cancer cell reprogramming is the therapeutic potential of retrieving normal cell functions from various malignancies. However, there are several major obstacles to overcome in cancer cell reprogramming before clinical translation, including characterization of reprogramming mechanisms, improvement of reprogramming efficiency and safety, and development of delivery methods. Recently, several insights in reprogramming mechanism have been proposed, and determining progress has been achieved to promote reprogramming efficiency and feasibility, allowing it to emerge as a promising therapy against cancer in the near future. This review aims to discuss recent applications in cancer cell reprogramming, with a focus on the clinical significance and limitations of different reprogramming approaches, while summarizing vital roles played by transcription factors, small molecules, microRNAs and exosomes during the reprogramming process.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsBenignCancer cell reprogrammingCancer stem cellExosomeInduced pluripotent stem cellMalignancyMicroRNAPluripotencySmall moleculeTranscription factor

Identifiers

PMID31464654
PMCPMC6716904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.