Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464638›Full record

ArticleTrials2019

Comparing the effect of STan (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram) with CTG alone on emergency caesarean section rates: study protocol for the STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START).

D Turnbull, A Salter, B Simpson, B W Mol, E Chandraharan, A McPhee, I Symonds, M Benton, S Kuah, G Matthews and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

D TurnbullSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
A SalterSchool of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
B SimpsonWomen's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7750-4168
B W MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
E ChandraharanNHS Foundation Trust, St George's University Hospitals, London, UK.
A McPheeWomen's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
I SymondsAdelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
M BentonSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
S KuahWomen's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
G MatthewsWomen's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
K HowardSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
C WilkinsonWomen's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. chris.wilkinson@sa.gov.au.
Women's and Children's Hospital · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUMonash University · AUSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1129648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiotocography is almost ubiquitous in its use in intrapartum care. Although it has been demonstrated that there is some benefit from continuous intrapartum fetal monitoring using cardiotocography, there is also an increased risk of caesarean section which is accompanied by short-term and long-term risks to the mother and child. There is considerable potential to reduce unnecessary operative delivery with up to a 60% false positive diagnosis of fetal distress using cardiotocography alone. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram is a promising adjunct to cardiotocography alone, and permits detection of metabolic acidosis of the fetus, potentially reducing false positive diagnosis of fetal distress.

methodsThis study will be a single-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial, conducted over 3 years. The primary hypothesis will be that the proportion of women with an emergency caesarean section on ST analysis will not equal that for women on cardiotocography monitoring alone. Participants will be recruited at the Women's and Children's Hospital, a high-risk specialty facility with approximately 5000 deliveries per annum. A total of 1818 women will be randomised to the treatment or conventional arm with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by parity. The primary outcome is emergency caesarean section (yes/no). Statistical analysis will follow standard methods for randomised trials and will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes will also be analysed. Additional study outcomes include psychosocial outcomes, patient preferences and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: Approximately 20% of Australian babies are delivered by emergency caesarean section. This will be the first Australian trial to examine ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram as an adjunct to cardiotocography as a potential method for reducing this proportion. The trial will be among the first to comprehensively examine ST analysis, taking into account the impact on psychosocial well-being as well as cost-effectiveness. This research will provide Australian evidence for clinical practice and guideline development as well as for policy-makers and consumers to make informed, evidence-based choices about care in labour.

trial registrationANZCTR, ACTRN1261800006268 . Registered on 19 January 2018.

Indexed as

CardiotocographyCesarean SectionElectrocardiographyHeart Rate, FetalParturitionSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedClinical Decision-MakingEmergenciesFemaleHumansPatient SelectionPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of ResultsSouth AustraliaCaesarean sectionCardiotocographyContinuous electronic fetal monitoringRandomised controlled trialST analysisSTART

Identifiers

PMID31464638
PMCPMC6716809
OpenAlexW2971272045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.