Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464623›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Mobile phone short message service (SMS) as a malaria control tool: a quasi-experimental study.

Aliyu Mohammed, Princess Ruhama Acheampong, Easmon Otupiri, Francis Adjei Osei, Roderick Larson-Reindorf, Ellis Owusu-Dabo

Open access · goldAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aliyu MohammedSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Princess Ruhama AcheampongSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Easmon OtupiriSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Francis Adjei OseiSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana. francisph1@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1094-813X
Roderick Larson-ReindorfSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Ellis Owusu-DaboSchool of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Kumasi, Ghana.
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHKomfo Anokye Teaching Hospital · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the extensive implementation of control measures and achievements in morbidity reductions, malaria continues to contribute to substantial morbidity and mortality in children under-five. Innovative approaches involving the use of mobile phones have been suggested to improve health outcomes. However, evidence of its effect on reducing the prevalence of malaria is limited. This study, therefore, aimed to assess the effect of a theory-driven mHealth intervention on the prevalence of malaria among children under-five living in rural districts of Ghana.

methodsWe conducted a quasi-experimental study of a 12-month intervention using a random sample of 332 caregivers with children under-five from two rural districts, assigned to either an intervention or a control group. Caregivers in the intervention group received voice short message service (SMS) on malaria prevention based on a behavior change theory to improve their health behaviors and practice, once a week for twelve months, while caregivers in the control group received none. Pre- and post-intervention assessment of the treatment effect (ATT) on malaria in children under-five was conducted using propensity score and difference-in-difference (DiD) analyses.

resultsAmong children whose caregivers received the intervention, the prevalence of malaria decreased from 58.4% at baseline to 37.8% at endline (difference: -20.6%; 95% CI: - 31.1, - 10.1) compared with children in the control group, where a reduction of 65.0 to 59.9% (difference - 5.1%; 95% CI: - 15.5, 5.4) was observed. The treatment effect at endline revealed a statistically significant reduction in malaria prevalence (ATT: -0.214; 95% CI: - 0.36, - 0.07) compared with the baseline (ATT: -0.035; 95% CI: - 0.16, 0.09). Overall, the intervention effect showed a significant reduction in the prevalence of malaria among children under-five was positive (DiD: - 0.154; p = 0.043).

conclusionThe results of the study indicate the effectiveness of mobile phone SMS as a control tool for reducing the burden of malaria in children under-five.

Indexed as

Text MessagingAdultCaregiversChild, PreschoolFemaleGhanaHealth BehaviorHumansInfantMalariaMaleProgram EvaluationRural PopulationTelemedicineYoung AdultBehavior change communicationChild healthExtended parallel process model (EPPM)MalariamHealthMobile phone

Identifiers

PMID31464623
PMCPMC6716929
OpenAlexW2971213833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.