Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464619›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

Fipronil and ivermectin treatment of cattle reduced the survival and ovarian development of field-collected Anopheles albimanus in a pilot trial conducted in northern Belize.

Staci M Dreyer, Donovan Leiva, Marla Magaña, Marie Pott, Jonathan Kay, Alvaro Cruz, Nicole L Achee, John P Grieco, Jefferson A Vaughan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Effect of IvermectinMalaria journal · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Broadening the range of use cases for ivermectin - a review of the evidence.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Staci M DreyerBiology Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA.
Donovan LeivaBelize Vector and Ecology Center, Orange Walk Town, Belize.
Marla MagañaBelize Vector and Ecology Center, Orange Walk Town, Belize.
Marie PottBelize Vector and Ecology Center, Orange Walk Town, Belize.
Jonathan KayBelize Vector and Ecology Center, Orange Walk Town, Belize.
Alvaro CruzBelize Vector and Ecology Center, Orange Walk Town, Belize.
Nicole L AcheeUniversity of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, 46556, USA.
John P GriecoUniversity of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, 46556, USA.
Jefferson A VaughanBiology Department, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA. jefferson.vaughan@und.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7067-0654
University of North Dakota · USUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

Endectocide use in livestock as a tool to help eliminate malaria in Central AmericaR21AI119771 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA · PI VAUGHAN, JEFFERSON ARCHER · 2017 to 2018
$382k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases R21AI119771NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI119771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost malaria vector control programmes rely on indoor residual spraying of insecticides and insecticide-treated bed nets. This is effective against vector species that feed indoors at night and rest inside the house afterwards. In Central America, malaria vectors have different behaviours and are typically exophagic (i.e., bite outdoors), exophilic (i.e., remain outdoors after feeding), and zoophagic (i.e., as likely to feed on non-humans as humans). Thus, malaria elimination in Central America may require additional tactics. This pilot study investigated whether commercially-available products used to treat livestock for ticks could also be used to kill and/or sterilize zoophagic malaria vectors that feed on treated cattle in Belize.

methodsCattle were treated with either a pour-on formulation of 1% fipronil (3 heifers) or injection of 1% ivemectin (1 heifer). Control heifers (n = 2) were left untreated. Field-collected Anopheles albimanus contained in screen-top cages were strapped onto cattle at 2, 5, 7, and 14 days after treatment. Mosquito mortality was monitored once a day for 4 successive days. Surviving mosquitoes were dissected to assess blood meal digestion and ovarian development.

resultsA total of 1078 female An. albimanus mosquitoes were fed and monitored for mortality. Both fipronil and ivermectin significantly reduced survivorship of An. albimanus for up to 7 days after treatment. By 14 days, efficacy had declined. The ivermectin treatment completely lost its effectiveness and even though the fipronil-treated heifers were still killing significantly more mosquitoes than the untreated heifers, the amount of mosquito killing had diminished greatly. Both treatments significantly reduced ovary development in mosquitoes fed on treated cattle for the duration of the 2-week trial.

conclusionsTreatment of cattle in northern Belize with topical fipronil and injectable ivermectin had significant lethal and sublethal effects on wild An. albimanus females. These results suggest that efforts towards eliminating residual transmission of malaria by zoophagic vectors in Central America may benefit by the judicious, targeted treatment of livestock with mosquitocidal compounds, such as fipronil or ivermectin.

Indexed as

InsecticidesIvermectinMosquito ControlOvaryPyrazolesAdministration, TopicalAnimalsBelizeCattleFeeding BehaviorFemaleInjections, IntramuscularMalariaMosquito VectorsPilot ProjectsfipronilInsecticidesIvermectinPyrazolesAnopheles albimanusBelizeCattleFipronilIvermectinMalaria

Identifiers

PMID31464619
PMCPMC6716933
OpenAlexW2971014110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.