Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464615›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Does gynaecological cancer care meet the needs of Indigenous Australian women? Qualitative interviews with patients and care providers.

Beverley Marcusson-Rababi, Kate Anderson, Lisa J Whop, Tamara Butler, Nicole Whitson, Gail Garvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Indigenous Australians' Experiences of Cancer Care: A Narrative Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  6. Improving Access to Cancer Treatment Services in Australia's Northern Territory-History and Progress.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beverley Marcusson-RababiCharles Darwin University, Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia. beverley.marcusson@menzies.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-0883
Kate AndersonCharles Darwin University, Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-2001
Lisa J WhopCharles Darwin University, Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-2933
Tamara ButlerCharles Darwin University, Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6507-8157
Nicole WhitsonCharles Darwin University, Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4718-8605
Gail GarveyCharles Darwin University, Wellbeing and Preventable Chronic Diseases Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Casuarina, NT, 0811, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-5716

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 1041111National Health and Medical Research Council 1105399National Health and Medical Research Council 1142035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a disparity in the burden of gynaecological cancer for Indigenous women compared with non-Indigenous women in Australia. Understanding how Indigenous women currently experience gynaecological cancer care services and factors that impact on their engagement with care is critical. This study explored Indigenous Australian women's experience of gynaecological cancer care at a major metropolitan hospital in Queensland.

methodsIndigenous women receiving care at a major metropolitan Queensland hospital for investigation or diagnosis of gynaecological cancer were invited to participate in a larger longitudinal study exploring women's experiences of gynaecological cancer care. This component was an in-depth, qualitative interview exploring the women's experiences of hospital care at approximately three-month post initial referral. A peer-approach was used to interview women. Hospital-based care providers involved in the care of Indigenous gynaecological cancer patients were invited to be interviewed. Interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed using an interpretative phenomenological approach enabling a multi-layered, contextualised understanding of the patients' experience and their interaction with tertiary cancer services.

resultsEight Indigenous patients and 18 care providers were interviewed. Analysis of all interviews revealed four broad issues affecting Indigenous patients' early experiences of care: (1) navigating the system, impacted by timely diagnosis, access to support services and follow up; (2) communication and decision-making, patients' decision-making, efficacy of doctor-patient communication, and patients' knowledge about cancer; (3) coping with treatment demands, was impacted by emotional stress, access to services and support by hospital staff; and (4) feeling welcome and safe in the hospital, impacted by patients' relationship with care providers and their access to culturally-safe services. The combination of factors impacting these women's' experience of gynaecological care commonly left these women at breaking point, often with limited access to information, resources or support.

conclusionsOur findings revealed that experiences of cancer care for Indigenous women are overlain by challenges associated with late referral, misdiagnosis, miscommunication, lack of information, logistics in accessing treatment and services and system cultural insensitivities. Our findings offer insights that can inform cancer care provision to more effectively support Indigenous women accessing gynaecological cancer services.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentAdolescentAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCaregiversCommunicationDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHospitals, UrbanHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CareCancerCultural safetyGynaecological cancerIndigenous AustraliansPatient-centred care

Identifiers

PMID31464615
PMCPMC6716815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.