Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464589›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Self-management support for chronic disease in primary care: frequency of patient self-management problems and patient reported priorities, and alignment with ultimate behavior goal selection.

Danielle M Hessler, Lawrence Fisher, Vicky Bowyer, L Miriam Dickinson, Bonnie T Jortberg, Bethany Kwan, Douglas H Fernald, Matt Simpson, W Perry Dickinson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01945918 (Comparing Strategies for Translating Self-management Support Into Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01945918 nacompletednot on this map

Comparing Strategies for Translating Self-management Support Into Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2013 to 2017Enrolled901ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsSelf-management support education, Connection to Health Interactive Behavior Change Technology, Connection to Health plus Coaching (CTH+C)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Personalized Priority and Progress Questionnaire (PPPQ): A personalized instrument for quality of life and self-management for use in clinical trials and practice.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An Assessment of Weight Loss Management in Health System Primary Care Practices.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle M HesslerDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. Danielle.Hessler@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4568-6953
Lawrence FisherDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Vicky BowyerDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
L Miriam DickinsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Bonnie T JortbergDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Bethany KwanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Douglas H FernaldDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Matt SimpsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
W Perry DickinsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Comparing Strategies for Translating Self-management Support into Primary CareR18DK096387 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI DICKINSON, WALTER PERRY · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK096387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo enable delivery of high quality patient-centered care, as well as to allow primary care health systems to allocate appropriate resources that align with patients' identified self-management problems (SM-Problems) and priorities (SM-Priorities), a practical, systematic method for assessing self-management needs and priorities is needed. In the current report, we present patient reported data generated from Connection to Health (CTH), to identify the frequency of patients' reported SM-Problems and SM-Priorities; and examine the degree of alignment between patient SM-Priorities and the ultimate Patient-Healthcare team member selected Behavioral Goal.

methodsCTH, an electronic self-management support system, was embedded into the flow of existing primary care visits in 25 primary care clinics and was used to assess patient-reported SM-Problems across 12 areas, patient identified SM-Priorities, and guide the selection of a Patient-Healthcare team member selected Behavioral Goal. SM-Problems included: BMI, diet (fruits and vegetables, salt, fat, sugar sweetened beverages), physical activity, missed medications, tobacco and alcohol use, health-related distress, general life stress, and depression symptoms. Descriptive analyses documented SM-Problems and SM-Priorities, and alignment between SM-Priorities and Goal Selection, followed by mixed models adjusting for clinic.

results446 participants with ≥ one chronic diseases (mean age 55.4 ± 12.6; 58.5% female) participated. On average, participants reported experiencing challenges in 7 out of the 12 SM-Problems areas; with the most frequent problems including: BMI, aspects of diet, and physical activity. Patient SM-Priorities were variable across the self-management areas. Patient- Healthcare team member Goal selection aligned well with patient SM-Priorities when patients prioritized weight loss or physical activity, but not in other self-management areas.

conclusionParticipants reported experiencing multiple SM-Problems. While patients show great variability in their SM-Priorities, the resulting action plan goals that patients create with their healthcare team member show a lack of diversity, with a disproportionate focus on weight loss and physical activity with missed opportunities for using goal setting to create targeted patient-centered plans focused in other SM-Priority areas. Aggregated results can assist with the identification of high frequency patient SM-Problems and SM-Priority areas, and in turn inform resource allocation to meet patient needs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01945918 .

Indexed as

Self-ManagementAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleGoalsHealth PrioritiesHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareYoung AdultChronic diseaseGoal settingSelf-managementShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID31464589
PMCPMC6714442
OpenAlexW2970013627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.