Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464493›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental psychology2019

Fear in infancy: Lessons from snakes, spiders, heights, and strangers.

Vanessa LoBue, Karen E Adolph

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05864131 (Effects of Parental Holding on Pain Response in Young Children During Cystometry), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05864131 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Parental Holding on Pain Response in Young Children During Cystometry: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled64ConditionsVesico-Ureteral Reflux, Filum Terminale LipomaArmsLying, Holding
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Multi-Component Model of Emotion Response Convergence: Implications for the Development of Psychopathology.Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion · 2025
    Article
  7. Stability of general cognitive ability from infancy to adulthood: A combined twin and genomic investigation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. How the Emotional Environment Shapes the Emotional Life of the Child.Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Social Fear in US Infants: The Roles of Hair and Salivary Cortisol.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Attend Less, Fear More: Elevated Distress to Social Threat in Toddlers With Autism Spectrum Disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Is there evidence for sensitive periods in emotional development?Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vanessa LoBueDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University.
Karen E AdolphDepartment of Psychology, New York University.
New York University · USRutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights · NL

Funding

Flexibility of Learning in Infant Skill AcquisitionR37HD033486 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E · 2006 to 2015
$4.9M
Flexibility of Learning in Infant Skill AcquisitionR01HD033486 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI ADOLPH, KAREN E · 2001 to 2023
$4.5M
Emerging relations between attention and negative affect in the first two years of lifeR01MH109692 · NIMH · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BUSS, KRISTIN A, LOBUE, VANESSA · 2016 to 2020
$4.5M
National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD033486NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD033486NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review challenges the traditional interpretation of infants' and young children's responses to three types of potentially "fear-inducing" stimuli-snakes and spiders, heights, and strangers. The traditional account is that these stimuli are the objects of infants' earliest developing fears. We present evidence against the traditional account, and provide an alternative explanation of infants' behaviors toward each stimulus. Specifically, we propose that behaviors typically interpreted as "fearful" really reflect an array of stimulus-specific responses that are highly dependent on context, learning, and the perceptual features of the stimuli. We speculate about why researchers so commonly misinterpret these behaviors, and conclude with future directions for studying the development of fear in infants and young children. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

LearningSnakesSpidersAnimalsFearHumansInfantPsychological Theory

Identifiers

PMID31464493
PMCPMC6716607
OpenAlexW2971091750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.