Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464379›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2019

A Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for the Prediction of Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics From In Vitro Data.

Hannah M Jones, Zhiwei Zhang, Paul Jasper, Haobin Luo, Lindsay B Avery, Lindsay E King, Hendrik Neubert, Hugh A Barton, Alison M Betts, Robert Webster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Model-informed drug discovery and development approaches to inform clinical trial design and regulatory decisions: A primer for the MENA region.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah M JonesBioMedicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Zhiwei ZhangRES Group Inc, Needham, Massachusetts, USA.
Paul JasperRES Group Inc, Needham, Massachusetts, USA.
Haobin LuoRES Group Inc, Needham, Massachusetts, USA.
Lindsay B AveryDMPK, Sanofi, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.
Lindsay E KingBioMedicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
Hendrik NeubertBioMedicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Andover, Massachusetts, USA.
Hugh A BartonBioMedicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Groton, Connecticut, USA.
Alison M BettsBioMedicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Robert WebsterBioMedicine Design, Pfizer Worldwide R&D, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USRenewable Energy Systems (United States) · USSanofi (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibody (mAb) pharmacokinetics (PK) have largely been predicted via allometric scaling with little consideration for cross-species differences in neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) affinity or clearance/distribution mechanisms. To address this, we developed a mAb physiologically-based PK model that describes the intracellular trafficking and FcRn recycling of mAbs in a human FcRn transgenic homozygous mouse and human. This model uses mAb-specific in vitro data together with species-specific FcRn tissue expression, tissue volume, and blood-flow physiology to predict mAb in vivo linear PK a priori. The model accurately predicts the terminal half-life of 90% of the mAbs investigated within a twofold error. The mechanistic nature of this model allows us to not only predict linear PK from in vitro data but also explore the PK and target binding of mAbs engineered to have pH-dependent binding to its target or FcRn and could aid in the selection of mAbs with optimal PK and pharmacodynamic properties.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHistocompatibility Antigens Class IHomozygoteHumansIn Vitro TechniquesLinear ModelsMiceMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalOrgan SpecificityReceptors, FcSpecies SpecificityAntibodies, MonoclonalFc receptor, neonatalHistocompatibility Antigens Class IReceptors, Fc

Identifiers

PMID31464379
PMCPMC6813168
OpenAlexW2970050461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.