Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31464205›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of andrology

Initial experience with a novel method for cognitive transperineal magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsy.

Hai-Feng Wang, Rui Chen, Bi-Ming He, Min Qu, Yan Wang, Heng-Zhi Lin, Qing-Song Yang, Xu Gao, Ying-Hao Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of andrology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Hai-Feng WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Rui ChenDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Bi-Ming HeDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Min QuDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Yan WangDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Heng-Zhi LinDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Qing-Song YangDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Xu GaoDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.
Ying-Hao SunDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cognitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted prostate biopsy conducted by an experienced clinician enhances the detection rate of (high-grade) prostate cancer; however, this method is less successful in the hands of inexperienced surgeons. Therefore, an alternative method of conducting a cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy that can be successfully performed by the inexperienced clinicians should be developed. Ninety-six males suspected of prostate cancer were analyzed using systematic biopsy and cognitive MRI-targeted biopsy based on our novel three-dimensional matrix positioning method. Typically, the core principle of the latter procedure was to put the MRI and ultrasound images into the same virtual coordinate system. Afterward, the targeted biopsy was transformed to target a coordinate for the suspected lesion in the MRI. Subsequently, patients were assessed for the presence/absence of prostate cancer or high-grade prostate cancer. According to our results, the overall detection rate of prostate cancer was 70.8% (68/96), and the detection rate of high-grade prostate cancer was 56.3% (54/96). Specifically, the detection rate of prostate cancer by systematic biopsy was 54.2% (52/96) and that by targeted biopsy was 59.4% (57/96; P = 0.560). Clearly, the combined application of targeted biopsy could remarkably increase the detection rates of prostate cancer (P = 0.025) and high-grade prostate cancer (P = 0.009). Taken together, the findings of this study suggest that the combination of systematic biopsy with our three-dimensional matrix positioning-driven cognitive-targeted biopsy is superior to systematic biopsy in detecting prostate cancer and high-grade prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAgedBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleHumansImage-Guided BiopsyImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPerineumProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsSoftwareUltrasonographyProstate-Specific Antigencognitive fusiontargeted biopsythree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID31464205
PMCPMC7406104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.