GuidelineKorean journal of radiology2019
Guideline for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging from the Korean Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Part 1: Standardized Protocol.
Guideline in Korean journal of radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physics-Guided Neural Network for Quantitative Parameter Mapping Using Balanced Steady State Free Precession MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiac MR function analysis with DL-based super resolution reconstruction: application in the clinical setting.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Asia: 2025 Status Update.Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Review
- Utilities and Limitations of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Validation of a deep learning-based software for automated analysis of T2 mapping in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Assessment Regarding the Safety of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Aortic Stenosis.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2023Article
- Phantom-based correction for standardization of myocardial native T1 and extracellular volume fraction in healthy subjects at 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.European radiology · 2022Article
- Semi-Quantitative Scoring of Late Gadolinium Enhancement of the Left Ventricle in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: Improving Interobserver Reliability and Agreement Using Consensus Guidance from the Asian Society of Cardiovascular Imaging-Practical Tutorial (ASCI-PT) 2020.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Introducing "Recommendation and Guideline" of theKorean journal of radiology · 2021Article
- A New Method for Aortic Valve Planimetry with High-Resolution 3-Dimensional MRI and Its Comparison with Conventional Cine MRI and Echocardiography for Assessing the Severity of Aortic Valvular Stenosis.Korean journal of radiology · 2021Article
- The recent advances, drawbacks, and the future directions of CMRI in the diagnosis of IHD.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Fast calculation software for modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping.BMC medical imaging · 2021Article
- Recommendation for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Phenotypic Study: Imaging Part.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology Based on the Citation Frequency.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Perceived Dark Rim Artifact in First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Due to Visual Illusion.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Article
- [Noninvasive Imaging of Pericardium].Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe chi · 2020Review
- A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in theKorean journal of radiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is widely used in many areas of cardiovascular disease assessment. This is a practical, standard CMR protocol for beginners that is designed to be easy to follow and implement. This protocol guideline is based on previously reported CMR guidelines and includes sequence terminology used by vendors, essential MR physics, imaging planes, field strength considerations, MRI-conditional devices, drugs for stress tests, various CMR modules, and disease/symptom-based protocols based on a survey of cardiologists and various appropriate-use criteria. It will be of considerable help in planning and implementing tests. In addressing CMR usage and creating this protocol guideline, we particularly tried to include useful tips to overcome various practical issues and improve CMR imaging. We hope that this document will continue to standardize and simplify a patient-based approach to clinical CMR and contribute to the promotion of public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.