ArticleMedical physics2019
Segmentation of dental cone-beam CT scans affected by metal artifacts using a mixed-scale dense convolutional neural network.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of Artificial Intelligence Models in Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthesis Restoration: A Systematic Review.International dental journal · 2025Pooled it
- Accuracy of artificial intelligence-based segmentation in maxillofacial structures: a systematic review.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Developing an Artificial Intelligence Solution to Autosegment the Edentulous Maxillary Bone for Implant Planning.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Semi-automatic individual tooth segmentation from CBCT images using anatomy-guided deep neural networks and watershed transform.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Automated differentiation of caries requiring filling and caries necessitating root canal treatment using machine learning.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- U-net-based segmentation of foreign bodies and ghost images in panoramic radiographs.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- A deep learning based automated maxillary sinus segmentation and bone grafts analysis in CBCT images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Automated Age Estimation from OPG Images and Patient Records Using Deep Feature Extraction and Modified Genetic-Random Forest.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Alveolar Bone Segmentation Methods in Assessing the Effectiveness of Periodontal Defect Regeneration Through Machine Learning of CBCT Data: A Systematic Review.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2025Review
- Clinical validity and precision of deep learning-based cone-beam computed tomography automatic landmarking algorithm.Imaging science in dentistry · 2024Article
- Empowering Modern Dentistry: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Patient Care and Clinical Decision Making.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Uncertainty-based Active Learning by Bayesian U-Net for Multi-label Cone-beam CT Segmentation.Journal of endodontics · 2024Article
- Performance of artificial intelligence using cone-beam computed tomography for segmentation of oral and maxillofacial structures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2023Review
- Determining the reliability of diagnosis and treatment using artificial intelligence software with panoramic radiographs.Imaging science in dentistry · 2023Article
- Synergy between artificial intelligence and precision medicine for computer-assisted oral and maxillofacial surgical planning.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Review
- Machine Learning in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Deploying Machine Learning Based Segmentation for Scientific Imaging Analysis at Synchrotron Facilities.IS&T International Symposium on Electronic Imaging · 2023Article
- A review on the application of deep learning for CT reconstruction, bone segmentation and surgical planning in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2022Review
- Evaluation of 3D Modeling Workflows Using Dental CBCT Data for Periodontal Regenerative Treatment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- AI-based automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial anatomy from CBCT scans for automatic detection of pharyngeal airway evaluations in OSA patients.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn order to attain anatomical models, surgical guides and implants for computer-assisted surgery, accurate segmentation of bony structures in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans is required. However, this image segmentation step is often impeded by metal artifacts. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a mixed-scale dense convolutional neural network (MS-D network) for bone segmentation in CBCT scans affected by metal artifacts.
methodTraining data were acquired from 20 dental CBCT scans affected by metal artifacts. An experienced medical engineer segmented the bony structures in all CBCT scans using global thresholding and manually removed all remaining noise and metal artifacts. The resulting gold standard segmentations were used to train an MS-D network comprising 100 convolutional layers using far fewer trainable parameters than alternative convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. The bone segmentation performance of the MS-D network was evaluated using a leave-2-out scheme and compared with a clinical snake evolution algorithm and two state-of-the-art CNN architectures (U-Net and ResNet). All segmented CBCT scans were subsequently converted into standard tessellation language (STL) models and geometrically compared with the gold standard.
resultsCBCT scans segmented using the MS-D network, U-Net, ResNet and the snake evolution algorithm demonstrated mean Dice similarity coefficients of 0.87 ± 0.06, 0.87 ± 0.07, 0.86 ± 0.05, and 0.78 ± 0.07, respectively. The STL models acquired using the MS-D network, U-Net, ResNet and the snake evolution algorithm demonstrated mean absolute deviations of 0.44 mm ± 0.13 mm, 0.43 mm ± 0.16 mm, 0.40 mm ± 0.12 mm and 0.57 mm ± 0.22 mm, respectively. In contrast to the MS-D network, the ResNet introduced wave-like artifacts in the STL models, whereas the U-Net incorrectly labeled background voxels as bone around the vertebrae in 4 of the 9 CBCT scans containing vertebrae.
conclusionThe MS-D network was able to accurately segment bony structures in CBCT scans affected by metal artifacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.