Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463937›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2019

Segmentation of dental cone-beam CT scans affected by metal artifacts using a mixed-scale dense convolutional neural network.

Jordi Minnema, Maureen van Eijnatten, Allard A Hendriksen, Niels Liberton, Daniël M Pelt, Kees Joost Batenburg, Tymour Forouzanfar, Jan Wolff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Machine Learning in Dentistry: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jordi MinnemaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Pathology, Amsterdam UMC and Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 3D Innovationlab, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maureen van EijnattenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Pathology, Amsterdam UMC and Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 3D Innovationlab, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Allard A HendriksenCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), 1090 GB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Niels LibertonMedical Technology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 3D Innovationlab, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniël M PeltCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), 1090 GB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kees Joost BatenburgCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica (CWI), 1090 GB, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tymour ForouzanfarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Pathology, Amsterdam UMC and Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 3D Innovationlab, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan WolffDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Pathology, Amsterdam UMC and Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam Movement Sciences, 3D Innovationlab, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research 639.073.506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn order to attain anatomical models, surgical guides and implants for computer-assisted surgery, accurate segmentation of bony structures in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans is required. However, this image segmentation step is often impeded by metal artifacts. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a mixed-scale dense convolutional neural network (MS-D network) for bone segmentation in CBCT scans affected by metal artifacts.

methodTraining data were acquired from 20 dental CBCT scans affected by metal artifacts. An experienced medical engineer segmented the bony structures in all CBCT scans using global thresholding and manually removed all remaining noise and metal artifacts. The resulting gold standard segmentations were used to train an MS-D network comprising 100 convolutional layers using far fewer trainable parameters than alternative convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures. The bone segmentation performance of the MS-D network was evaluated using a leave-2-out scheme and compared with a clinical snake evolution algorithm and two state-of-the-art CNN architectures (U-Net and ResNet). All segmented CBCT scans were subsequently converted into standard tessellation language (STL) models and geometrically compared with the gold standard.

resultsCBCT scans segmented using the MS-D network, U-Net, ResNet and the snake evolution algorithm demonstrated mean Dice similarity coefficients of 0.87 ± 0.06, 0.87 ± 0.07, 0.86 ± 0.05, and 0.78 ± 0.07, respectively. The STL models acquired using the MS-D network, U-Net, ResNet and the snake evolution algorithm demonstrated mean absolute deviations of 0.44 mm ± 0.13 mm, 0.43 mm ± 0.16 mm, 0.40 mm ± 0.12 mm and 0.57 mm ± 0.22 mm, respectively. In contrast to the MS-D network, the ResNet introduced wave-like artifacts in the STL models, whereas the U-Net incorrectly labeled background voxels as bone around the vertebrae in 4 of the 9 CBCT scans containing vertebrae.

conclusionThe MS-D network was able to accurately segment bony structures in CBCT scans affected by metal artifacts.

Indexed as

ArtifactsCone-Beam Computed TomographyMetalsNeural Networks, ComputerHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedProstheses and ImplantsToothMetalscone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)image segmentationmetal artifacts

Identifiers

PMID31463937
PMCPMC6900023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.