Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463880›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2020

REBOA as a rescue strategy for catastrophic vascular injury during robotic surgery.

Elizabeth C England, Charlotte R Spear, Dih-Dih Huang, Jordan Weinberg, James N Bogert, Thomas Gillespie, James Mankin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Challenges of conversion from robotic surgery for vascular complications.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizabeth C EnglandCreighton University School of Medicine Phoenix Regional Campus, St. Joseph's Hospital Medical Center, 500 West Thomas Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA. lcengland@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0284-3020
Charlotte R SpearCreighton University School of Medicine Phoenix Regional Campus, St. Joseph's Hospital Medical Center, 500 West Thomas Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Dih-Dih HuangCreighton University School of Medicine Phoenix Regional Campus, St. Joseph's Hospital Medical Center, 500 West Thomas Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Jordan WeinbergCreighton University School of Medicine Phoenix Regional Campus, St. Joseph's Hospital Medical Center, 500 West Thomas Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
James N BogertCreighton University School of Medicine Phoenix Regional Campus, St. Joseph's Hospital Medical Center, 500 West Thomas Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Thomas GillespieCreighton University School of Medicine Phoenix Regional Campus, St. Joseph's Hospital Medical Center, 500 West Thomas Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
James MankinCreighton University School of Medicine Phoenix Regional Campus, St. Joseph's Hospital Medical Center, 500 West Thomas Road, Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ, 85013, USA.
Creighton University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catastrophic bleeding is a feared complication of robotic abdominal procedures that involve dissection in close proximity to major vessels. In the event of uncontrollable hemorrhage, standard practice involves emergency undocking with conversion to laparotomy. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is a rapid and life-saving technique gaining acceptance in the trauma setting for the management of catastrophic hemorrhage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate feasibility of REBOA for emergency hemostasis during robotic surgery. The surgical robot was docked to a REBOA mannequin to simulate an upper abdominal surgery. A femoral arterial line was placed in the mannequin. Supplies needed for REBOA insertion were opened and arranged on the surgical back table. The surgeon was seated at the console with an assistant scrubbed. A catastrophic vascular injury was announced. The time it took the surgeon to achieve aortic occlusion by the REBOA was recorded. Four surgeons participated and performed three timed trials each. Each surgeon, irrespective of experience with REBOA or years in surgical practice, was able to obtain aortic occlusion in less than 2 min. The mean time to aortic occlusion for all surgeons was 111 s. No manipulation of the robotic arms was required to perform the procedure. Aortic occlusion was achieved rapidly with REBOA. Ability to achieve prompt aortic control was not associated with surgical experience or prior familiarity with the REBOA device. Prophylactic femoral access and preparation of supplies facilitates prompt placement of the occlusion balloon. REBOA should be considered as a viable alternative to open laparotomy for temporary hemorrhage control during robotic surgery.

Indexed as

AortaAbdomenBalloon OcclusionEmergenciesFeasibility StudiesHemorrhageHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsManikinsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSeverity of Illness IndexSimulation TrainingAortic occlusionREBOARobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID31463880
OpenAlexW2970489645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.