Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463874›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Removal of DNA-fragmented spermatozoa using flow cytometry and sorting does not improve the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Christian De Geyter, Ursula Gobrecht-Keller, Astrid Ahler, Manuel Fischer

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02166567 (The Effect of Sorting of Non-apoptotic and Apoptotic Spermatozoa Using Flow Cytometry on the Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02166567 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Sorting of Non-apoptotic and Apoptotic Spermatozoa Using Flow Cytometry on the Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2013 to 2017Enrolled100ConditionsMale InfertilityArmsStaining of spermatozoa with the YoPro dye and sorting of the stained spermatozoa with FACS, Swim-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian De GeyterReproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology (RME), University Hospital, University of Basel, Vogesenstrasse 134, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland. christian.degeyter@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0889-6310
Ursula Gobrecht-KellerReproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology (RME), University Hospital, University of Basel, Vogesenstrasse 134, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Astrid AhlerReproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology (RME), University Hospital, University of Basel, Vogesenstrasse 134, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Manuel FischerReproductive Medicine and Gynecological Endocrinology (RME), University Hospital, University of Basel, Vogesenstrasse 134, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Repronatal Foundation, Basel, Switzerland none
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe DNA fragmentation in sperm is associated with reduced outcome in assisted reproduction. Using YoPro1 as the staining dye and flow cytometry and sorting (FACS), the number of spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation can be lowered to 5%. Can the cumulative outcome of ICSI be improved using FACS?

methodsA prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted in 104 infertile couples with male infertility based on abnormal conventional semen analysis results. Cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate was the primary outcome parameter. In 52 cases, semen was processed for ICSI using swim-up. In another 52 cases, spermatozoa with fragmented DNA were removed with FACS.

resultsThe cumulative pregnancy rate at 12 weeks of gestation (51.9% versus 46.2%) and live birth rate (42.3% versus 34.6%) were higher and the miscarriage rate was lower (27.8% versus 35.3%) after FACS-sorting as compared with swim-up. An interim analysis scheduled before initiation of the study after 100 cases demonstrated that the aim of a 20% gain in pregnancy rate could not be achieved. For that reason, the prospective study was stopped prematurely.

conclusionsA trend towards consistently better results was achieved by removing spermatozoa with fragmented DNA. The fragmentation of the DNA in sperm is the end stage of apoptosis. Sorting of spermatozoa may be improved by selecting parameters of processes active more upstream of apoptosis, such as chromatin decondensation.

trial registrationNCT02166567 . June 14, 2014.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroAbortion, SpontaneousAdultBirth RateChromatinDNA FragmentationFemaleFlow CytometryHumansInfertility, MaleMalePregnancyPregnancy RateSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicChromatinApoptosisChromatin remodelingDNA fragmentationFlow cytometryICSI

Identifiers

PMID31463874
PMCPMC6823333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.