Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463873›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Contribution of cryopreservation to the cumulative live birth rate: a large multicentric cycle-based data analysis from the Italian National Registry.

G Scaravelli, P E Levi-Setti, C Livi, G La Sala, F M Ubaldi, E Greco, M E Coccia, A Borini, A Revelli, G Ricci and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

G ScaravelliART Italian National Register, National Centre for Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion, National Health Institute, Rome, Italy. giulia.scaravelli@iss.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0720-9467
P E Levi-SettiIRCCS, Division of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
C LiviART Center DEMETRA, Florence, Italy.
G La SalaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Arcispedale S. Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
F M UbaldiGENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via de Notaris 2B, Rome, Italy.
E GrecoCenter for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Via Portuense 700, 00149, Rome, Italy.
M E CocciaDAI-MI -AOU, Careggi-University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
A Borini9.baby, Family and Fertility Center, Tecnobios Procreazione, Bologna, Italy.
A RevelliGynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, University of Torino, Torino, Italy.
G RicciInstitute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
V VigilianoART Italian National Register, National Centre for Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion, National Health Institute, Rome, Italy.
R De LucaART Italian National Register, National Centre for Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion, National Health Institute, Rome, Italy.
S BolliART Italian National Register, National Centre for Diseases Prevention and Health Promotion, National Health Institute, Rome, Italy.
L RienziGENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via de Notaris 2B, Rome, Italy.
Collaborators
National Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · ITEuropean Hospital · ITHumanitas University · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITClinica Valle Giulia · ITIRCCS Materno Infantile Burlo Garofolo · ITUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo estimate the contribution of cryopreservation to the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) after law modification in Italy in the era of vitrification and freeze-all.

methodsThe Italian National Registry performed a cycle-based data collection. Nine Italian IVF clinics were involved incorporating a total of 10,260 fresh cycles performed between January 2015 and April 2016 resulting in 9273 oocyte retrievals and 3266 subsequent warming cycles from the same oocyte retrievals performed up to December 2016. Mean female age was 37 ± 4.3 years. Primary outcome measure was CLBR per oocyte retrieval. Confounding factors were tested in multivariate regression analysis, and the relative impact of cryopreservation to the CLBR in different patient categories was calculated.

resultsCLBR per oocyte retrieval was 32.6%, 26.5%, 18.7%, 13.0%, and 5.5% for women younger than 36, aged 36-39, 40-41, and older than 41 years, respectively. The total relative contribution of oocyte/embryo cryopreservation was 40.6% (95% CI 38.41-42.75). An association between maternal age, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, cryopreservation, and cumulative live birth was shown. When adjusted for confounders, a 2.3-fold increase was observed in the chance of live birth when cryopreservation was performed (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.99-2.56). In high responder patients (> 15 oocytes retrieved) where freeze-all was applied in 67.6% of cycles to avoid the risk of hyper stimulation syndrome, the relative contribution of vitrification to the CLBR was 80.6%.

conclusionsCryopreservation is essential in IVF and should always be available to patients to optimize success rates. Multicentric, cycle-based data analyses are crucial to provide infertile couples, clinicians, and regulatory bodies with accurate information on IVF effectiveness including fresh and cryopreserved cycles.

Indexed as

CryopreservationCumulative delivery rateICSIIVFLive birthNational Register

Identifiers

PMID31463873
PMCPMC6885470
OpenAlexW2970326674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.