Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463844›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2019

Stable Isotope-Resolved Metabolomics by NMR.

Penghui Lin, Andrew N Lane, Teresa W-M Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Live Metabolomics with NMR.Analytical chemistry · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. NMR-Based Stable Isotope Tracing of Cancer Metabolism.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Quantitative NMR Methods in Metabolomics.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mapping endocrine networks by stable isotope tracing.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. NMR-based metabolomics: Where are we now and where are we going?Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Penghui LinCenter for Environmental and Systems Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Andrew N LaneCenter for Environmental and Systems Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. andrew.lane@uky.edu.
Teresa W-M FanCenter for Environmental and Systems Biochemistry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

University of Kentucky Center for Cancer MetabolismP20GM121327 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Binhua P Zhou · 2017 to 2026
$25.0M
SAMPLE COREU24DK097215 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI, HIGASHI, RICHARD M · 2013 to 2017
$8.7M
Systems Biochemistry in Lung Cancer: Toward a Mechanistic Understanding of NSCLCP01CA163223 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI, FAN, TERESA WHEI-MEI · 2013 to 2017
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA163223NIDDK NIH HHS U24 DK097215NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM121327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stable isotopes enable the tracing of atoms from precursors to products via metabolic transformations in situ and in crude extracts. NMR has some unique capabilities that are especially suited for metabolic analysis, including atom position-resolved isotope analysis and isotope editing. In this chapter we describe NMR-based analysis of positional isotopomer distribution using metabolic tracers.

Indexed as

MetabolomeHumansIsotope LabelingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsIsotopomersQuantificationSpectral editingStable isotope-resolved metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID31463844
PMCPMC7256830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.