ArticleDysphagia2020
Clinical Analysis of Denture Impaction in the Esophagus of Adults.
Article in Dysphagia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dislodged Denture in a Patient on High-flow Nasal Cannula: A Rare Mechanical Complication.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2025Article
- Man on Noninvasive Positive Airway Pressure Ventilation With Throat Pain.Journal of acute medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Retrievable Silicone-Covered Esophageal Stent-Assisted Endoscopic Extraction of a High-Risk Clasp-Retained Denture Impacted at the Aortic Arch Level of the Esophagus: A Case Report.Case reports in gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Denture impacted in the esophagus of adults has been a complex foreign body for otolaryngologists. We reviewed clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and treatment of these patients and evaluated computed tomography (CT) scans to identify a better method of dealing with such tricky situations. Twenty-nine patients who underwent rigid esophagoscopy were included in this retrospective study conducted at the University hospital. The patients underwent preoperative tests and examinations, including complete blood count, blood type and coagulation, electrocardiogram, and CT. The commonest symptoms were retrosternal pain, dysphagia, and odynophagia. Duration of the foreign body impacted within 24 h was 65.5%. CT findings revealed that 4 of 24 cases had complications in the upper esophagus, with 3 of the 4 cases in the mid-esophagus and 1 in the lower esophagus. Complications were related to the duration and location of the obstruction (P < 0.05). The location and complications based on CT findings were coherent with rigid esophagoscopy findings. Denture impaction in the esophagus can be fatal. Early intervention is crucial for prognosis. CT is used for diagnosing and guiding doctors in managing. The commonest location of impacted dentures was the upper esophagus with a lower incidence of complications. The incidence of an impacted denture in the mid-esophagus was low but with a high risk of complications. The incidence of an impacted denture in the lower esophagus was rare. Surgery and proper treatment ensure a good prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.