Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463615›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2020

Clinical and organizational factors predicting readmission for mental health patients across Italy.

Federico Tedeschi, V Donisi, D Salazzari, J Cresswell-Smith, K Wahlbeck, F Amaddeo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federico TedeschiSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Ospedale Policlinico "G.B. Rossi", University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy. federico.tedeschi@univr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4670-5335
V DonisiSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Ospedale Policlinico "G.B. Rossi", University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
D SalazzariSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Ospedale Policlinico "G.B. Rossi", University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
J Cresswell-SmithMental Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
K WahlbeckMental Health Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), P.O. Box 30, 00271, Helsinki, Finland.
F AmaddeoSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, Ospedale Policlinico "G.B. Rossi", University of Verona, P.le L.A. Scuro, 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.

Funding

FP7 Health 603264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aims of our study are: to explore rehospitalization in mental health services across Italian regions, Local Health Districts (LHDs), and hospitals; to examine the predictive power of different clinical and organizational factors.

methodsThe data set included adult patients resident in Italy discharged from a general hospital episode with a main psychiatric diagnosis in 2012. Independent variables at the individual, hospital, LHD, and region levels were used. Outcome variables were individual-level readmission and LHD-level readmission rate to any hospital at 1-year follow-up. The association with readmission of each variable was assessed through both single- and multi-level logistic regression; descriptive statistics were provided to assess geographical variation. Relevance of contextual effects was investigated through a series of random-effects regressions without covariates.

resultsThe national 1-year readmission rate was 43.0%, with a cross-regional coefficient of variation of 6.28%. Predictors of readmission were: admission in the same LHD as residence, psychotic disorder, higher length of stay (LoS), higher rate of public beds in the LHD; protective factors were: young age, involuntary admission, and intermediate number of public healthcare staff at the LHD level. Contextual factors turned out to affect readmission only to a limited degree.

conclusionsHomogeneity of readmission rates across regions, LHDs, hospitals, and groups of patients may be considered as a positive feature in terms of equity of the mental healthcare system. Our results highlight that readmission is mainly determined by individual-level factors. Future research is needed to better explore the relationship between readmission and LoS, discharge decision, and resource availability.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHospitals, DistrictHospitals, PsychiatricHumansItalyLength of StayMaleMental DisordersMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPatient DischargePatient ReadmissionRegression AnalysisContextual variationHospital readmissionPsychiatric patientsRandom effects

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.