Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463602›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2019

Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly: a uni- and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors.

Niccolò Favaretto, Gino Marioni, Davide Brotto, Flavia Sorrentino, Flavia Gheller, Alessandro Castiglione, Silvia Montino, Luciano Giacomelli, Patrizia Trevisi, Alessandro Martini and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Commented on by
    2020
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niccolò FavarettoDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy. niccolo.favaretto.87@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5727-5388
Gino MarioniDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Davide BrottoDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Flavia SorrentinoDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Flavia GhellerDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Alessandro CastiglioneDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Silvia MontinoDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Luciano GiacomelliDepartment of Medicine DIMED, Padova University, Padova, Italy.
Patrizia TrevisiDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Alessandro MartiniDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
Roberto BovoDepartment of Neuroscience DNS, Otolaryngology Section, Padova University, Via Giustiniani 2, 35128, Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess preoperative features that could predict the audiological outcome after cochlear implantation in the elderly, in terms of pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and speech perception performance.

methodsAll available records of patients with cochlear implants aged 65 or more at the time of their implantation at our Institution were reviewed (50 patients, mean age 70.76 ± 4.03 years), recording preoperative clinical features. Pure tone audiometry, speech audiometry, and speech perception performance 1 year after cochlear implant activation and fitting were used as outcome measures.

resultsNo statistically significant association emerged between clinical features and pure tone audiometry. On univariate analysis, progressive sensorineural hearing loss of unknown origin was associated with a better outcome in terms of speech audiometry and speech perception performance (p = 0.035 and p = 0.033, respectively). On multivariate analysis, progressive sensorineural hearing loss retained its independent prognostic significance in terms of speech perception performance (p = 0.042). The discriminatory power of a two-variable panel (age and etiology of hearing loss) featured an AUC (ROC) of 0.738 (an acceptable discriminatory power according to the Hosmer-Lemeshow scale).

conclusionsA progressive sensorineural hearing loss of unknown origin was associated with a better outcome in terms of speech perception in the elderly in our case study. Further features that can predict audiological outcome achievable with cochlear implants in the elderly are desirable to perform adequate counselling and rehabilitation programs.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationHearing LossHearing Loss, SensorineuralAgedAudiometry, Pure-ToneAudiometry, SpeechFemaleHumansMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisSpeech PerceptionCochlear implantsElderlyMultivariateOutcome

Identifiers

PMID31463602
OpenAlexW2970815766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.