Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463579›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Medication reconciliation: time to save? A cross-sectional study from one acute hospital.

Elaine K Walsh, Ann Kirby, Patricia M Kearney, Colin P Bradley, Aoife Fleming, Kieran A O'Connor, Ciaran Halleran, Timothy Cronin, Elaine Calnan, Patricia Sheehan and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elaine K WalshDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. elaine.walsh@ucc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0718-4207
Ann KirbySchool of Economics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Patricia M KearneySchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Colin P BradleyDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Aoife FlemingSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Kieran A O'ConnorDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Ciaran HalleranDepartment of Pharmacy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Timothy CroninSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Elaine CalnanDepartment of Pharmacy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Patricia SheehanDepartment of Pharmacy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Laura GalvinDepartment of Pharmacy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Derina ByrneDepartment of Pharmacy, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Laura J SahmSchool of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedication errors during transitional care are an important patient safety issue. Medication reconciliation is an established intervention to reduce such errors. Current evidence has not demonstrated an associated reduction in healthcare costs, however, with complexity and resource intensity being identified as issues. The aims of this study were to examine an existing process of medication reconciliation in terms of time taken, to identify factors associated with additional time, and to determine if additional time is associated with detecting errors of clinical significance.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted. Issues arising during medication reconciliation incurring a time burden additional to the usual process were logged and quantified by pharmacists. Regression analyses investigated associations between patient characteristics and clinically significant errors and additional time. Cost for additional time in terms of hospital pharmacist salary was calculated.

resultsEighty-nine patients were included. Having a personal record of medication at admission (OR 3.30, 95% CI: (1.05 to 10.42), p = 0.004) was a significant predictor of additional time. No significant associations were found between the occurrence of clinically significant error and additional time (p > 0.05). The most common reason for additional time was clarifying issues pertaining to primary care medication information. Projected annual 5-year costs for the mean additional time of 3.75 min were €1.8-1.9 million.

conclusionsSpending additional time on medication reconciliation is associated with economic burden and may not yield benefit in terms of capturing clinically significant errors. There is a need to improve communication of medication information between primary and secondary care.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationMiddle AgedPatient SafetyPharmacistsHealthcare costsMedication errorMedication reconciliationTransitional care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.