Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463514›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2019

Minimum Travel Distance Among Publicly Insured Infants with Severe Congenital Heart Disease: Potential Impact of In-state Restrictions.

Joyce L Woo, Brett R Anderson, Daniel Gruenstein, Rena Conti, Kao-Ping Chua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joyce L WooDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 3959 Broadway, CHN-253, New York, NY, 10032, USA. jw3554@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6958-4903
Brett R AndersonDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 3959 Broadway, CHN-253, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Daniel GruensteinDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago Medical Center, 5839 S. Maryland Ave, MC 4051, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Rena ContiInstitute of Health System Innovation and Policy Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Boston University, 595 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Kao-Ping ChuaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical Center, 300 North Ingalls, SPC 5456, Room 6E18, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

Funding

Using Default Opioid Prescription Settings to Limit Excessive Opioid Prescribing to Adolescents and Young AdultsK08DA048110 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHUA, KAO-PING · 2019 to 2023
$983k
The Congenital Heart Technical Skill Study: Improving Outcomes for Infants and Children with Congenital Heart DiseaseK23HL133454 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ANDERSON, BRETT ROMEO · 2017 to 2019
$572k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL13343NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL133454NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA048110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Travel distance to surgical centers may be increased when coverage restrictions prevent children with congenital heart disease (CHD) from receiving care at out-of-state congenital heart surgery centers. We estimated the minimum travel distance to congenital heart surgery centers among publicly insured infants with time-sensitive CHD surgical needs, under two different scenarios: if they were and were not restricted to in-state centers. Using 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract data from 40 states, we identified 4598 infants with CHD that require surgery in the first year of life. We calculated the minimum travel distance between patients' homes and the nearest cardiac surgery center, assuming patients were and were not restricted to in-state centers. We used linear regression to identify demographic predictors of distance under both scenarios. When patients were not restricted to in-state centers, mean minimum travel distance was 43.7 miles, compared to 54.1 miles when they were restricted. For 5.9% of patients, the difference in travel distance under the two scenarios exceeded 50 miles. In six states, the difference in mean minimum travel distance exceeded 20 miles. Under both scenarios, distance was positively predicted by rural status, residence in middle-income zip codes, and white/non-Hispanic or American Indian/Alaskan Native race/ethnicity. For some publicly insured infants with severe CHD, facilitating the receipt of out-of-state care could mitigate access barriers. Existing efforts to regionalize care at fewer centers should be designed to avoid exacerbating access barriers among publicly insured CHD patients.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMedicaidTravelUnited StatesCongenital heart diseaseEthics and policyHealth services research

Identifiers

PMID31463514
PMCPMC6851488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.