ArticleHawai'i journal of health & social welfare2019
Characteristics of Orofacial Clefting in Hawai'i.
Article in Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic Factors in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefts.Global medical genetics · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Orofacial clefts are birth defects that require a multi-disciplinary approach for repair and ongoing management as there are often concomitant chronic health issues. Orofacial clefts can occur as an isolated finding, in combination with other anomalies, or as part of a genetic syndrome. When occurring as part of a genetic syndrome, the complexity of management increases and has lifelong implications for these individuals, their families, and their health care providers. Understanding factors related to the occurrence of syndromic orofacial clefting is important for birth defect research and for health care needs assessment and planning. Many research groups have addressed these issues by studying different populations and focusing on different questions. This study was a retrospective chart review of children with orofacial clefts cared for at a pediatric tertiary care center in Hawai'i to evaluate the proportion of isolated and syndromic clefts in the unique population of Hawai'i. The prevalence of syndromic and isolated clefts were then correlated with ethnicity and compared to the prevalence in other studies. Our goal was to increase knowledge about orofacial clefting in the population of Hawai'i. The proportion of isolated orofacial clefting in a population of patients with orofacial clefting cared for at a craniofacial clinic is similar to birth defect registry data for the Hawaiian Islands (59% vs 58%). Pacific Islanders in our study and prior study have a lower proportion of isolated clefts, suggesting that there are more craniofacial patients with syndromic and complex needs in this population. Further study is needed to clarify the etiologic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31463475PMC6695337W3024702042What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.