ArticleJOR spine2019
Off-axis response due to mechanical coupling across all six degrees of freedom in the human disc.
Article in JOR spine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intervertebral disc degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Can axial loading restore in vivo disc geometry, opening pressure, and T2 relaxation time?JOR spine · 2024Article
- Geometric determinants of the mechanical behavior of image-based finite element models of the intervertebral disc.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2024Article
- Off-Axis Loading Fixture for Spine Biomechanics: Combined Compression and Bending.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2023Article
- Article
- Midterm osteolysis-induced aseptic failure of the M6-C™ cervical total disc replacement secondary to polyethylene wear debris.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022Article
- Multiaxial validation of a finite element model of the intervertebral disc with multigenerational fibers to establish residual strain.JOR spine · 2021Article
- Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence.JOR spine · 2021Review
- One strike loading organ culture model to investigate the post-traumatic disc degenerative condition.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2021Article
- Lumbar and cervical viscoelastic disc replacement: Concepts and current experience.World journal of orthopedics · 2020Review
- Measuring the neutral zone of spinal motion segments: Comparison of multiple analysis methods to quantify spinal instability.JOR spine · 2020Article
- Off-axis response due to mechanical coupling across all six degrees of freedom in the human disc.JOR spine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The kinematics of the intervertebral disc are defined by six degrees of freedom (DOF): three translations (Tz: axial compression, Tx: lateral shear, and Ty: anterior-posterior shear) and three rotations (Rz: torsion, Rx: flexion-extension, and Ry: lateral bending). There is some evidence that the six DOFs are mechanically coupled, such that loading in one DOF affects the mechanics of the other five "off-axis" DOFs, however, most studies have not controlled and/or measured all six DOFs simultaneously. Additionally, the relationships between disc geometry and disc mechanics are important for evaluation of data from different sized donor and patient discs. The objectives of this study were to quantify the mechanical behavior of the intervertebral disc in all six degrees of freedom (DOFs), measure the coupling between the applied motion in each DOF with the resulting off-axis motions, and test the hypothesis that disc geometry influences these mechanical behaviors. All off-axis displacements and rotations were significantly correlated with the applied DOF and were of similar magnitude as physiologically relevant motion, confirming that off-axis coupling is an important mechanical response. Interestingly, there were pairs of DOFs that were especially strongly coupled: lateral shear (Tx) and lateral bending (Ry), anterior-posterior shear (Ty) and flexion-extension (Rx), and compression (Tz) and torsion (Rz). Large off-axis shears may contribute to injury risk in bending and flexion. In addition, the disc responded to shear (Tx, Ty) and rotational loading (Rx, Ry, and Rz) by increasing in disc height in order to maintain the applied compressive load. Quantifying these mechanical behaviors across all six DOF are critical for designing and testing disc therapies, such as implants and tissue engineered constructs, and also for validating finite element models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.