Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463458›Full record

ReviewJOR spine2019

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in spine research.

Fabio Galbusera, Gloria Casaroli, Tito Bassani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JOR spine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. [Application and prospect of machine learning in orthopaedic trauma].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Are current machine learning applications comparable to radiologist classification of degenerate and herniated discs and Modic change? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Spinopelvic measurements of sagittal balance with deep learning: systematic review and critical evaluation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Artificial Intelligence and Computer Aided Diagnosis in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision in Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Global analysis and prospects of assisted pedicle screw placement surgery: a bibliometric study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Clinical-radiomics nomogram construction from magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose osteoporosis: a preliminary study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabio GalbuseraLaboratory of Biological Structures Mechanics IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi Milan Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1826-9190
Gloria CasaroliLaboratory of Biological Structures Mechanics IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi Milan Italy.
Tito BassaniLaboratory of Biological Structures Mechanics IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi Milan Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques are revolutionizing several industrial and research fields like computer vision, autonomous driving, natural language processing, and speech recognition. These novel tools are already having a major impact in radiology, diagnostics, and many other fields in which the availability of automated solution may benefit the accuracy and repeatability of the execution of critical tasks. In this narrative review, we first present a brief description of the various techniques that are being developed nowadays, with special focus on those used in spine research. Then, we describe the applications of AI and ML to problems related to the spine which have been published so far, including the localization of vertebrae and discs in radiological images, image segmentation, computer-aided diagnosis, prediction of clinical outcomes and complications, decision support systems, content-based image retrieval, biomechanics, and motion analysis. Finally, we briefly discuss major ethical issues related to the use of AI in healthcare, namely, accountability, risk of biased decisions as well as data privacy and security, which are nowadays being debated in the scientific community and by regulatory agencies.

Indexed as

artificial neural networksdeep learningethical implicationsoutcome predictionsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID31463458
PMCPMC6686793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.