Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463447›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2018

Leaping the hurdles in developing regenerative treatments for the intervertebral disc from preclinical to clinical.

Abbey A Thorpe, Frances C Bach, Marianna A Tryfonidou, Christine L Le Maitre, Fackson Mwale, Ashish D Diwan, Keita Ito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Orthobiologic Management Options for Degenerative Disc Disease.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Immuno-Modulatory Effects of Intervertebral Disc Cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Abbey A ThorpeBiomolecular Sciences Research Centre Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield UK.
Frances C BachDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4481-0051
Marianna A TryfonidouDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Utrecht University Utrecht the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2333-7162
Christine L Le MaitreBiomolecular Sciences Research Centre Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4489-7107
Fackson MwaleDepartment of Surgery McGill University Montreal Canada.
Ashish D DiwanSpine Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery St. George & Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales Sydney Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1037-8421
Keita ItoOrthopaedic Biomechanics Division, Department of Biomedical Engineering Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7372-4072
Sheffield Hallam University · GBUtrecht University · NLMcGill University · CASutherland Hospital · AUUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P026796/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic back and neck pain is a prevalent disability, often caused by degeneration of the intervertebral disc. Because current treatments for this condition are less than satisfactory, a great deal of effort is being applied to develop new solutions, including regenerative strategies. However, the path from initial promising idea to clinical use is fraught with many hurdles to overcome. Many of the keys to success are not necessarily linked to science or innovation. Successful translation to clinic will also rely on planning and awareness of the hurdles. It will be essential to plan your entire path to clinic from the outset and to do this with a multidisciplinary team. Take advice early on regulatory aspects and focus on generating the proof required to satisfy regulatory approval. Scientific demonstration and societal benefits are important, but translation cannot occur without involving commercial parties, which are instrumental to support expensive clinical trials. This will only be possible when intellectual property can be protected sufficiently to support a business model. In this manner, commercial, societal, medical, and scientific partners can work together to ultimately improve patient health. Based on literature surveys and experiences of the co-authors, this opinion paper presents this pathway, highlights the most prominent issues and hopefully will aid in your own translational endeavors.

Indexed as

intellectual propertyintervertebral disclow back painneck painregenerationtranslation

Identifiers

PMID31463447
PMCPMC6686834
OpenAlexW2828050787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.