Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31463445›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2018

Successful fishing for nucleus pulposus progenitor cells of the intervertebral disc across species.

Daisuke Sakai, Jordy Schol, Frances C Bach, Adel Tekari, Nobuho Sagawa, Yoshihiko Nakamura, Samantha C W Chan, Tomoko Nakai, Laura B Creemers, Daniela A Frauchiger and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Daisuke SakaiDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9436-7553
Jordy ScholDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5489-2591
Frances C BachDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4481-0051
Adel TekariTissue and Organ Mechanobiology, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Medical Faculty University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1676-0920
Nobuho SagawaDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2212-0228
Yoshihiko NakamuraCenter for Regenerative Medicine Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2297-2885
Samantha C W ChanTissue and Organ Mechanobiology, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Medical Faculty University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7174-2659
Tomoko NakaiDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2800-8568
Laura B CreemersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery University Medical Centre Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1585-3052
Daniela A FrauchigerTissue and Organ Mechanobiology, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Medical Faculty University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2583-9702
Rahel D MayTissue and Organ Mechanobiology, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Medical Faculty University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6742-003X
Sibylle GradAO Spine Research Network, AO Spine International Davos Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9552-3653
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment for Orthopaedic Surgery Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9038-0446
Marianna A TryfonidouDepartment of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2333-7162
Benjamin GantenbeinTissue and Organ Mechanobiology, Institute for Surgical Technology and Biomechanics, Medical Faculty University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9005-0655
Tokai University · JPUniversity of Bern · CHUtrecht University · NLAO Foundation · CHUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, Tie2/TEK receptor tyrosine kinase (Tie2 or syn. angiopoietin-1 receptor) positive nucleus pulposus progenitor cells were detected in human, cattle, and mouse. These cells show remarkable multilineage differentiation capacity and direct correlation with intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration and are therefore an interesting target for regenerative strategies. Nevertheless, there remains controversy over the presence and function of these Tie2 PURPOSE: Here, we present a comprehensive protocol for sorting of Tie2

methodsWe present flow cytometry protocols to isolate the Tie2

resultsOur protocols are efficient towards labeling and isolation of Tie2

conclusionsCurrent identification of Tie2

Indexed as

biologic therapiesculture systemsstem celltissue‐specific progenitor cells

Identifiers

PMID31463445
PMCPMC6686801
OpenAlexW2808218792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.